UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

US uses napalm in Iraq -- do you think it's true?	by Esteis	2006-11-19 12:55:59
I have serious doubts that napalm was used (n/t)	by romandas	2005-02-08 12:01:27
Do you have any counterproof? (n/t)	by Esteis	2005-02-08 12:03:24
That depends on if you consider not seeing it	by romandas	2006-11-19 12:55:59
No fuel-air bomb, alas:	by Esteis	2005-02-08 12:27:11
It's a fuel gel, not vapour. FAB's rely on vapour mixing with air for explosion. The Mark 77's, conversely, use a gel that is scattered over as wide an area as possible and burns. Tactical reasons to use napalm that were mentioned: (1) the Colonel saying that the Iraqi's were in a good defensive position; (2) 'The generals' [wanting to use] its psychological effect. No good reasons, I agree; but they still appear to have used it, which makes it all the worse. If I may ask: what would be 'indicative of napalm use'?
[ Reply ]
Melting and charring from a liquid-like flow	by romandas	2005-02-08 12:29:27
But this is supposed to be 'more environ-friendly'	by Esteis	2006-11-19 12:55:59
well it's a more localized effect	by unjust	2005-02-08 13:35:13
FaO makes not just a big boom.	by joecrouse	2005-02-08 13:43:31

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)