|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I do it when i'm in the city | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:11:30 |
|
Using your logic... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:05:18 |
|
Nonono, we had that already | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:09:10 |
|
No, that's your interpretation. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:12:54 |
|
Sorry, I can't agree there | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:21:03 |
|
Which amounts to this morality: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:24:26 |
|
I disagree | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:30:35 |
|
Assumption again: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:33:08 |
|
If someone couldn't secure it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:38:46 |
|
OK, so they didn't read the manual. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:42:19 |
|
I just see it differently | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:54:36 |
|
The server analogy... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:58:10 |
|
A WAP is specifically tasked to handle | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:01:37 |
|
oh, all that being said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:06:27 |
|
um... and there you crossed the line | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:20:39 |
|
Hmm | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:21:56 |
|
Same as telling a woman her mammary is hanging out | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:25:36 |
|
I await Illiad or someone else commenting | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:35:47 |
|
Legal maybe, Ethical... | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:41:24 |
|
but that is an ENTIRELY different case | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:45:21 |
|
So you don't think | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:48:09 |
|
you're twisting here and avoiding the intrusion | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:53:42 |
|
How would there be another way to warn? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:56:17 |
| net send? |
by lonegunman |
2005-01-27 12:50:12 |
Admittedly it doesn't work on all flavours of Windows, and the Messenger service it relies on on NT-based Windows (NT, 2K, XP) may be disabled or blocked.
On the other hand, anyone who sets up a WAP and applies little to no security due to lack of knowledge or skill will likely not have Messenger blocked or disabled. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Didn't consider that | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:52:36 |
|
the popup is more regulated | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:55:24 |