|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I do it when i'm in the city | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:11:30 |
|
Using your logic... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:05:18 |
|
Nonono, we had that already | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:09:10 |
|
No, that's your interpretation. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:12:54 |
|
Sorry, I can't agree there | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:21:03 |
|
Which amounts to this morality: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:24:26 |
|
I disagree | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:30:35 |
|
Assumption again: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:33:08 |
|
If someone couldn't secure it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:38:46 |
|
OK, so they didn't read the manual. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:42:19 |
|
I just see it differently | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:54:36 |
|
The server analogy... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:58:10 |
|
A WAP is specifically tasked to handle | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:01:37 |
|
oh, all that being said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:06:27 |
|
um... and there you crossed the line | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:20:39 |
|
Hmm | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:21:56 |
|
Same as telling a woman her mammary is hanging out | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:25:36 |
|
I await Illiad or someone else commenting | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:35:47 |
|
Legal maybe, Ethical... | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:41:24 |
|
but that is an ENTIRELY different case | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:45:21 |
|
So you don't think | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:48:09 |
|
you're twisting here and avoiding the intrusion | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:53:42 |
|
How would there be another way to warn? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:56:17 |
|
you consider putting a file on theit PC ethical? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:02:35 |
|
Your hung up on the action | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:24 |
|
the actions you took are unethical and illegal her | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:09:06 |
|
legal does not always equal ethical | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:13:25 |
|
the stepstaken in warning breeched their privacy ( (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:21:36 |
|
but it wasn't taken advantage of | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:54 |
| how do THEY know that? |
by plblark |
2005-01-27 12:30:29 |
and again, it ceased being OK the moment you entered their network and pc. the ends do not justify the means.
we should agree to disagree, I'll probably not be swayed that though your intentions were noble, your methods were illegal here, and would cause me great unease should they be directed my way. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Yeah | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:34:12 |
|
agreed to disagree then | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:35:34 |
|
would you be offended if I TLP this since it's | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:38:32 |
|
Go for it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:51:17 |