|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I do it when i'm in the city | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:11:30 |
|
Using your logic... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:05:18 |
|
Nonono, we had that already | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:09:10 |
|
No, that's your interpretation. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:12:54 |
|
Sorry, I can't agree there | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:21:03 |
|
Which amounts to this morality: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:24:26 |
|
I disagree | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:30:35 |
|
Assumption again: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:33:08 |
|
If someone couldn't secure it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:38:46 |
|
OK, so they didn't read the manual. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:42:19 |
|
I just see it differently | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:54:36 |
|
The server analogy... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:58:10 |
|
A WAP is specifically tasked to handle | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:01:37 |
| oh, all that being said |
by MikeCDN |
2005-01-27 11:06:27 |
I do recomend that everyone secure there WAPs, becuase there are people who do abuse connections. Whenever I set up for people I always make that very clear, and have even dropped a note in the startup folder of a few people's computers when using WAPs, saying
"Oh just so you know your WAP is insecure, as is your PC and anyone can come in and flip through your PC. You should consider locking your WAP, and heres how to lock your PC"
of course then you have people like my dad. When refering to shaw on demand's website (which is the same password as to access all your billing properties); "Can't you set this up to not require a password?" and when you point out that its so no one can access his account "Whose going to do that? It's pointless" |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
um... and there you crossed the line | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:20:39 |
|
Hmm | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:21:56 |
|
Same as telling a woman her mammary is hanging out | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:25:36 |
|
I await Illiad or someone else commenting | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:35:47 |
|
Wasn't meant quite that seriously | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:39:16 |
|
I didn't mean as a mod, I meant in response to | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:48:05 |
|
Information on a computer | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:51:29 |
|
wouldn't it feel like stalking? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:54:37 |
|
I'm sure it would | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:58:04 |
|
I'd call the cops and place a camera to catch them | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:03:54 |
|
So you'd rather | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:53 |
|
twist.turn. avoid. cloud. | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:07:30 |
|
It's exactly what you said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:08:41 |
|
I'd prosecute someone who entered my car | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:11:27 |
|
If someone was willing to leave a note | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:19:25 |
|
here's my response: | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:24:47 |
|
I live in a house too | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:27:49 |
|
Sadly, I cannot pick up dozens of hotspots | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:32:19 |
|
At home | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:38:38 |
|
Legal maybe, Ethical... | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:41:24 |
|
but that is an ENTIRELY different case | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:45:21 |
|
So you don't think | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:48:09 |
|
you're twisting here and avoiding the intrusion | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:53:42 |
|
How would there be another way to warn? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:56:17 |
|
you consider putting a file on theit PC ethical? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:02:35 |
|
Your hung up on the action | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:24 |
|
the actions you took are unethical and illegal her | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:09:06 |
|
legal does not always equal ethical | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:13:25 |
|
the stepstaken in warning breeched their privacy ( (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:21:36 |
|
but it wasn't taken advantage of | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:54 |
|
how do THEY know that? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:30:29 |
|
Yeah | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:34:12 |
|
agreed to disagree then | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:35:34 |
|
would you be offended if I TLP this since it's | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:38:32 |
|
Go for it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:51:17 |
|
net send? | by lonegunman | 2005-01-27 12:50:12 |
|
Didn't consider that | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:52:36 |
|
the popup is more regulated | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:55:24 |
|
Eh... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:26:09 |
|
You live in Canuckistan too :) | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:28:38 |
|
You Liberal!!!1111eleven (n/t) | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:32:14 |
|
Would you belive I voted Alliance? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:35:24 |
|
You neocon!!!!111hundredandeleven | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:36:04 |
|
YOU pot smoking hippy!!!!111111111!!!!111!!! | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:39:07 |
|
Hey man... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:58:47 |
|
Can't blame you at all | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:01:25 |