|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I do it when i'm in the city | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:11:30 |
|
Using your logic... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:05:18 |
|
Nonono, we had that already | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:09:10 |
|
No, that's your interpretation. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:12:54 |
|
Sorry, I can't agree there | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:21:03 |
|
Which amounts to this morality: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:24:26 |
| I disagree |
by MikeCDN |
2005-01-27 10:30:35 |
If the person has made no attepmt to secure there networks its not important to them, and if you don't abuse the access (huge downloads, launch virii, attack there computers) then things are back to normal when you leave, and they won't even notice while you are there.
Your in BC, our ISPS are softcapped with bandwidth, so unless you hugely abuse the connection, then your not hurting them, they are going to be charged nor are they going to have there connection cut becuase of your usage. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Assumption again: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:33:08 |
|
There you go again, assuming stupidity | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:36:39 |
|
Why does it matter? | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:40:49 |
|
If someone couldn't secure it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:38:46 |
|
OK, so they didn't read the manual. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:42:19 |
|
I just see it differently | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:54:36 |
|
The server analogy... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:58:10 |
|
A WAP is specifically tasked to handle | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:01:37 |
|
oh, all that being said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:06:27 |
|
um... and there you crossed the line | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:20:39 |
|
Hmm | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:21:56 |
|
Same as telling a woman her mammary is hanging out | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:25:36 |
|
I await Illiad or someone else commenting | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:35:47 |
|
Wasn't meant quite that seriously | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:39:16 |
|
I didn't mean as a mod, I meant in response to | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:48:05 |
|
Information on a computer | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:51:29 |
|
wouldn't it feel like stalking? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:54:37 |
|
I'm sure it would | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:58:04 |
|
I'd call the cops and place a camera to catch them | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:03:54 |
|
So you'd rather | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:53 |
|
twist.turn. avoid. cloud. | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:07:30 |
|
It's exactly what you said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:08:41 |
|
I'd prosecute someone who entered my car | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:11:27 |
|
If someone was willing to leave a note | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:19:25 |
|
here's my response: | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:24:47 |
|
I live in a house too | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:27:49 |
|
Sadly, I cannot pick up dozens of hotspots | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:32:19 |
|
At home | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:38:38 |
|
Legal maybe, Ethical... | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:41:24 |
|
but that is an ENTIRELY different case | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:45:21 |
|
So you don't think | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:48:09 |
|
you're twisting here and avoiding the intrusion | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:53:42 |
|
How would there be another way to warn? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:56:17 |
|
you consider putting a file on theit PC ethical? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:02:35 |
|
Your hung up on the action | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:24 |
|
the actions you took are unethical and illegal her | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:09:06 |
|
legal does not always equal ethical | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:13:25 |
|
the stepstaken in warning breeched their privacy ( (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:21:36 |
|
but it wasn't taken advantage of | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:54 |
|
how do THEY know that? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:30:29 |
|
Yeah | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:34:12 |
|
agreed to disagree then | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:35:34 |
|
would you be offended if I TLP this since it's | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:38:32 |
|
Go for it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:51:17 |
|
net send? | by lonegunman | 2005-01-27 12:50:12 |
|
Didn't consider that | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:52:36 |
|
the popup is more regulated | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:55:24 |
|
Eh... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:26:09 |
|
You live in Canuckistan too :) | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:28:38 |
|
You Liberal!!!1111eleven (n/t) | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:32:14 |
|
Would you belive I voted Alliance? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:35:24 |
|
You neocon!!!!111hundredandeleven | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:36:04 |
|
YOU pot smoking hippy!!!!111111111!!!!111!!! | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:39:07 |
|
Hey man... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:58:47 |
|
Can't blame you at all | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:01:25 |
|
Other assumptions you are making: | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 11:08:28 |