|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| I do it when i'm in the city |
by MikeCDN |
2005-01-27 09:11:30 |
Turn on my laptop while downtown, wait 1 minute, my laptop will have a internet connection, open ICQ.
I have no moral qualm with it.
The way I look at it, my computer, asks your computer / access point for permission, your computer gives my computer the SSID and the connection details, my computer asks yours for LAN information, yours willing gives me info through the DHCP.
Your computer invites mine to connect by willingly giving all the details. If you don't want it then don't let it give me the details.
It's like telling a child not to let strangers into the home. Stranger comes to the door, asks to come in, kid can either let them or refuse. The stranger may have good or bad purposes, but they were still invited in. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Wrong wrong wrong! | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 09:39:54 |
|
Using your logic... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:05:18 |
|
Nonono, we had that already | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:09:10 |
|
No, that's your interpretation. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:12:54 |
|
Sorry, I can't agree there | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:21:03 |
|
Which amounts to this morality: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:24:26 |
|
That's a compliment I can return | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:29:05 |
|
Impasse. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:31:11 |
|
I disagree | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:30:35 |
|
Assumption again: | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:33:08 |
|
There you go again, assuming stupidity | by Control | 2005-01-27 10:36:39 |
|
Why does it matter? | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:40:49 |
|
If someone couldn't secure it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:38:46 |
|
OK, so they didn't read the manual. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:42:19 |
|
I just see it differently | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:54:36 |
|
The server analogy... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:58:10 |
|
A WAP is specifically tasked to handle | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:01:37 |
|
oh, all that being said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:06:27 |
|
um... and there you crossed the line | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:20:39 |
|
Hmm | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:21:56 |
|
Same as telling a woman her mammary is hanging out | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:25:36 |
|
I await Illiad or someone else commenting | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:35:47 |
|
Wasn't meant quite that seriously | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:39:16 |
|
I didn't mean as a mod, I meant in response to | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:48:05 |
|
Information on a computer | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:51:29 |
|
wouldn't it feel like stalking? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:54:37 |
|
I'm sure it would | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:58:04 |
|
I'd call the cops and place a camera to catch them | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:03:54 |
|
So you'd rather | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:53 |
|
twist.turn. avoid. cloud. | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:07:30 |
|
It's exactly what you said | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:08:41 |
|
I'd prosecute someone who entered my car | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:11:27 |
|
If someone was willing to leave a note | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:19:25 |
|
here's my response: | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:24:47 |
|
I live in a house too | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:27:49 |
|
Sadly, I cannot pick up dozens of hotspots | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:32:19 |
|
At home | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:38:38 |
|
Legal maybe, Ethical... | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:41:24 |
|
but that is an ENTIRELY different case | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:45:21 |
|
So you don't think | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:48:09 |
|
you're twisting here and avoiding the intrusion | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:53:42 |
|
How would there be another way to warn? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:56:17 |
|
you consider putting a file on theit PC ethical? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:02:35 |
|
Your hung up on the action | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:04:24 |
|
the actions you took are unethical and illegal her | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:09:06 |
|
legal does not always equal ethical | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:13:25 |
|
the stepstaken in warning breeched their privacy ( (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:21:36 |
|
but it wasn't taken advantage of | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:54 |
|
how do THEY know that? | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:30:29 |
|
Yeah | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:34:12 |
|
agreed to disagree then | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:35:34 |
|
would you be offended if I TLP this since it's | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:38:32 |
|
Go for it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:51:17 |
|
net send? | by lonegunman | 2005-01-27 12:50:12 |
|
Didn't consider that | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:52:36 |
|
the popup is more regulated | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:55:24 |
|
Eh... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:26:09 |
|
You live in Canuckistan too :) | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:28:38 |
|
You Liberal!!!1111eleven (n/t) | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:32:14 |
|
Would you belive I voted Alliance? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:35:24 |
|
You neocon!!!!111hundredandeleven | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:36:04 |
|
YOU pot smoking hippy!!!!111111111!!!!111!!! | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:39:07 |
|
Hey man... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 11:58:47 |
|
Can't blame you at all | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:01:25 |
|
Other assumptions you are making: | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 11:08:28 |
|
I disagree | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:24:06 |
|
Completely irrelevant. | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:30:23 |
|
how is it selfish? | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:36:03 |
|
using up gas | by plblark | 2005-01-27 10:37:49 |
|
The harm comes from... | by Illiad | 2005-01-27 10:39:29 |