|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Is it yours? Did you get permission? | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 07:37:52 |
|
You make it sound easier than it is | by Control | 2005-01-27 07:41:11 |
|
Yes, it is. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 07:46:20 |
|
What about sound? | by Control | 2005-01-27 07:52:08 |
|
You're going to look like a ninny. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:00:09 |
|
I don't agree | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:04:14 |
| Someone has to pay real money |
by BloodyViking |
2005-01-27 08:06:32 |
| for these services. When you use them without paying, you are stealing that portion of the money from either the subscriber, or the service provider. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
No because it doesn't cost them any more | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:11:24 |
|
How do you know it is "waste light"? | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 08:15:48 |
|
Now that's a point I must conceed | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:19:16 |
|
Most ISPs don't have a hard cap | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:20:13 |
|
AFAIK, It isn't uncommon for them to charge | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 09:36:26 |
|
Neither shaw nor telus have ever charged | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:43:54 |
|
how about stealing | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:32:14 |
|
How is that considered stealing? | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:35:54 |
|
no, you're not. | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:39:43 |
|
My dad had one of those chips for years | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:44:34 |
|
they refused to sell it to him, he took it | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:58:13 |
|
Yep, Legal reasons, Canada laws | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:00:42 |
|
takk a service w/o paying w/o permission: wrong | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:20:04 |
|
Guess a very different base ethics | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:06 |
|
they said NO, we CAN'T sell to you | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:33:31 |
|
Not really | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:50:15 |
|
there is a reason it is illegal in Canada | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 13:07:07 |
|
Your right, there is a reason | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 13:09:58 |
|
so to circumvent a law placed by your elected | by plblark | 2005-01-27 13:17:59 |
|
Actually it wasn't the company prosecuting | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 13:31:46 |