|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Is it yours? Did you get permission? | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 07:37:52 |
|
You make it sound easier than it is | by Control | 2005-01-27 07:41:11 |
|
Yes, it is. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 07:46:20 |
|
What about sound? | by Control | 2005-01-27 07:52:08 |
|
You're going to look like a ninny. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:00:09 |
| I don't agree |
by Control |
2005-01-27 08:04:14 |
As I've mentioned several times now, my main point is that the whole concept of 'property' and 'theft' relates to material objects, and simply does not parse for these things.
If someone sets up the slightest safeguard to prevent me from using the signal, or even just sets a sign like an SSID that says 'Keep out', then common decency says I leave it alone. But if not, then I assume it's like the porchlight, or the stereo, or a fountain for that matter. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Someone has to pay real money | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 08:06:32 |
|
No because it doesn't cost them any more | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:11:24 |
|
How do you know it is "waste light"? | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 08:15:48 |
|
Now that's a point I must conceed | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:19:16 |
|
Most ISPs don't have a hard cap | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:20:13 |
|
AFAIK, It isn't uncommon for them to charge | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 09:36:26 |
|
Neither shaw nor telus have ever charged | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:43:54 |
|
how about stealing | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:32:14 |
|
How is that considered stealing? | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:35:54 |
|
no, you're not. | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:39:43 |
|
My dad had one of those chips for years | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:44:34 |
|
they refused to sell it to him, he took it | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:58:13 |
|
Yep, Legal reasons, Canada laws | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:00:42 |
|
takk a service w/o paying w/o permission: wrong | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:20:04 |
|
Guess a very different base ethics | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:06 |
|
they said NO, we CAN'T sell to you | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:33:31 |
|
Not really | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:50:15 |
|
there is a reason it is illegal in Canada | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 13:07:07 |
|
Your right, there is a reason | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 13:09:58 |
|
so to circumvent a law placed by your elected | by plblark | 2005-01-27 13:17:59 |
|
Actually it wasn't the company prosecuting | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 13:31:46 |
|
Is a cordless phone signal a material object? | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:08:01 |
|
Don't worry about me coming. | by krikkert | 2005-01-27 08:11:27 |
|
Sure you are. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:14:47 |
|
It isn't illegal to use a cordless phone signal.. | by hemlock | 2005-01-27 08:12:03 |
|
They're not that encrypted. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:19:30 |
|
This is true. | by hemlock | 2005-01-27 08:53:08 |
