|
Connecting to unsecured wireless: Is it hijacking? | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Is it yours? Did you get permission? | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 07:37:52 |
|
You make it sound easier than it is | by Control | 2005-01-27 07:41:11 |
| Yes, it is. |
by nin_man |
2005-01-27 07:46:20 |
If it originates from my system, or a system I'm responsible for, it's mine.
Ultimately, a wireless connection is hooked into an internet connection that I am or my company is paying for. That, also, is mine. If it isn't hooked into an internet connection, then it serves a private network, which is also mine. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
What about sound? | by Control | 2005-01-27 07:52:08 |
|
You're going to look like a ninny. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:00:09 |
|
I don't agree | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:04:14 |
|
Someone has to pay real money | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 08:06:32 |
|
No because it doesn't cost them any more | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:11:24 |
|
How do you know it is "waste light"? | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 08:15:48 |
|
Now that's a point I must conceed | by Control | 2005-01-27 08:19:16 |
|
Most ISPs don't have a hard cap | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:20:13 |
|
AFAIK, It isn't uncommon for them to charge | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 09:36:26 |
|
Neither shaw nor telus have ever charged | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:43:54 |
|
how about stealing | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:32:14 |
|
How is that considered stealing? | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:35:54 |
|
no, you're not. | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:39:43 |
|
My dad had one of those chips for years | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:44:34 |
|
they refused to sell it to him, he took it | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:58:13 |
|
Yep, Legal reasons, Canada laws | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:00:42 |
|
takk a service w/o paying w/o permission: wrong | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:20:04 |
|
Guess a very different base ethics | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:25:06 |
|
they said NO, we CAN'T sell to you | by plblark | 2005-01-27 12:33:31 |
|
Not really | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 12:50:15 |
|
there is a reason it is illegal in Canada | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 13:07:07 |
|
Your right, there is a reason | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 13:09:58 |
|
so to circumvent a law placed by your elected | by plblark | 2005-01-27 13:17:59 |
|
Actually it wasn't the company prosecuting | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 13:31:46 |
|
Is a cordless phone signal a material object? | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:08:01 |
|
Don't worry about me coming. | by krikkert | 2005-01-27 08:11:27 |
|
Sure you are. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:14:47 |
|
It isn't illegal to use a cordless phone signal.. | by hemlock | 2005-01-27 08:12:03 |
|
They're not that encrypted. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:19:30 |
|
This is true. | by hemlock | 2005-01-27 08:53:08 |
|
Try this one on for size: | by Peace_man | 2005-01-27 08:58:02 |
|
Control tried that already. | by nin_man | 2005-01-27 08:59:38 |
|
Nice logic:-P | by Peace_man | 2005-01-27 09:08:09 |
|
Yep. | by krikkert | 2005-01-27 09:10:11 |
|
wow, self depreciation even (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-01-27 09:10:14 |
|
Its not a good analogy. | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:37:31 |
|
The problem with that analogy | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 09:34:38 |
|
Ok, so I touch the roses | by Control | 2005-01-27 09:40:14 |
|
you were in trespass (n/t) | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:38:16 |
|
No, they're hanging over the sidewalk | by Control | 2005-01-27 11:42:38 |
|
you're not helping yourself by re-writing the | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:47:32 |
|
The signal is, the network isn't. | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 11:52:26 |
|
uh but when you leave | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 09:44:57 |
|
but if he had running processes, | by plblark | 2005-01-27 10:07:30 |
|
but thats not true | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:27:26 |
|
but during the time you were there | by plblark | 2005-01-27 10:36:31 |
|
s/CPU/bandwidth/ (n/t) | by plblark | 2005-01-27 10:38:23 |
|
yes i'm reading it | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 10:58:12 |
|
I see a lot of Ass and U and Mptions | by plblark | 2005-01-27 11:24:02 |
|
Well that falls into abuse categories | by MikeCDN | 2005-01-27 11:30:48 |
|
just because you think the crime | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:41:01 |
|
replace illegal with wrong :) (nt) | by gibuu | 2005-01-27 11:42:13 |
|
Bad analogy. | by BloodyViking | 2005-01-27 08:02:57 |