UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Good film adaptations of books	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 11:23:41
LOTR (Jackson version) (n/t)	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 11:26:24
Not really.	by McNutcase	2004-12-30 11:27:02
I though it did a pretty good job	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 11:28:03
I have to agree with McNutcase.	by hadji	2004-12-30 11:35:04
For one thing, the movie reduced the council of Elrond to squabbling children. Also, Loth Lorien was badly glossed over in the movie. And there were some other things that weren't quite right. I agree that as a movie, it wasn't bad. But as a translation of the book, it was rather deficient.
[ Reply ]
Only so much you can do	by MikeCDN	2004-12-30 11:38:03
Very true.	by hadji	2004-12-30 11:43:05
The books don't have a movie flow.	by nin_man	2004-12-30 13:30:26
I'm also with McNutcase and hadji	by jdelphiki	2004-12-30 11:52:57
I disagree with point #1...	by niwikki	2004-12-30 14:30:35
Wholehearted agreement to #3	by Tars_Tarkas	2006-11-19 12:55:59
And where in $dieties Name was Tom Bombadil? (n/t)	by moongoddess	2004-12-30 22:19:11

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)