UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Good film adaptations of books	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 11:23:41
I'm going to get mixed reactions on this one:	by retiqlum2	2004-12-30 11:30:35
not even the director's cut version	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 11:34:25
that's 3.5 hours long. There were things I liked about Lynch's "dune", but the screenplay wasn't one of them. Liked the sets, costumes (except for the 3rd stage Guild Navagators and the stupid cat/rat thing the Harkonen had). Sting's acting was laughable, and Kyle McGloghlan was unconvincing as well. I though the SciFi channel's version did a better job of conveying the story than Lynch did.
[ Reply ]
Couldn't watch the SciFi version.	by mad_peter	2004-12-30 11:48:03
*Pulls out Gom Jabber	by hyzenthlay	2004-12-30 11:48:52
I am a human being	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 11:54:05
Sci Fi version	by hyzenthlay	2004-12-30 13:12:37
OK they both suck	by voxwoman	2004-12-30 13:14:05
Agreed! (n/t)	by hyzenthlay	2004-12-30 13:20:20
I tried to watch the director's cut once	by niwikki	2004-12-30 14:33:51

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)