The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

recursive -> iterative by dennismv2004-12-21 02:24:43
  I don't have time to give a full answer... by Liava 2004-12-21 03:55:22
... But I'm pretty sure the answer is no, unless it is tail recursive.

What's tail recursive, you say?

Tail recursive is when the recursive call is the very last thing that happens in the procedure. E.g. quicksort would *not* be tail recursive, for example. In such a case, instead of making an explicit call to the function, you just overwrite your parameter values, and goto the top of the function.

Scheme will generally automatically convert tail-recursive algorithms into iterative ones. I don't know about any other programming languages, though. Some C compilers have been known to do it, as well.
[ Reply ]
    Qsort by dennismv2004-12-21 04:15:00
      I'd still call that a recursive solution, though by Liava2004-12-21 04:30:46
        recursion by dennismv2004-12-21 04:50:19
          I have gotten rid of the recursive call by Version0.12004-12-21 08:40:48
          Well, the algorithm is as follows: by Liava2004-12-21 11:46:07
            ok by dennismv2004-12-21 19:34:10
              Not what I meant by Liava2004-12-21 22:05:31
                Much of this could be avoided. by williamashbless2004-12-21 23:32:22

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)