The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
A Canadian Pastor arrested for reading the bible? by glitch2004-12-14 07:45:08
  IANAL, but... by gaygeek2004-12-14 07:55:32
    Under Hate Crimes Legislation in Canada... by DShade2006-11-19 12:55:59
      And that makes sense, by Dazed2004-12-14 09:23:53
        Wow. I'm reading this... by glitch2006-11-19 12:55:59
          Answers by jugulum 2004-12-14 13:30:27
And it's crazy. Most of these are in direct violation of one of the 10 commandments, though shall not kill.

Short answer: "kill" is a bad translation; "murder" is better.

Seriously, if you think "kill" is the correct translation, you must think the Jews were completely disassociative.

Verse 17 is in direct violation of Adam and Eve's children, if you believe we all are from 2 human beings, who must have commited adultry in order to populate the earth.

I assume you meant incest. Yes, unless you suppose God made wives for Adam and Eve's kids, incest is required. But Leviticus contains plenty of new commands. You wouldn't point to a pre-Moses person eating pork and criticize them for violating the dietary rules--why not allow that incest may not have always been a sin?
[ Reply ]
            Well... by MikeCDN2004-12-14 13:34:04
              Specifically for homosexuality, I presume? by jugulum2004-12-14 14:20:34
                Your right by MikeCDN2004-12-14 14:30:58
                  Wow. by jugulum2004-12-14 15:53:50
                    Becuase I'm not Christian by MikeCDN2004-12-14 15:56:54
                      OK, I'll expand my point. by jugulum2004-12-14 16:34:55
                        P.S. by jugulum2004-12-14 16:35:56
                        Heh. by Ravenlock2004-12-14 16:42:30
                          Really? by jugulum2004-12-14 17:05:55
                            The large number of people... by Ravenlock2006-11-19 12:55:59
                              Oh, I see. by jugulum2004-12-14 21:27:43
                        Says your demonitation by MikeCDN2004-12-14 16:57:50
                          I don't have a denomination. by jugulum2004-12-14 17:39:53
                            I'm not arguing religion by MikeCDN2004-12-14 18:29:20
                              My belief is of no importance. None whatsoever. by jugulum2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                um wtf? by MikeCDN2004-12-14 23:15:36
                                Thank you! by jugulum2006-11-19 12:55:59
                I think you've got a wording problem, there. by Ravenlock2004-12-14 16:40:34
                  I largely agree...But it's not a wording problem. by jugulum2004-12-14 22:03:31

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)