UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Please explain the logic in this...	by dire_lobo	2004-10-21 09:33:36
3c) was never completed to anyone's satisfaction.	by BloodyViking	2004-10-21 10:32:06
That was a big part of what the weapons inspectors were supposed to be doing (when they weren't kicked out of the country). 5(2nd)) That was only one of the rationales for going to war. Conclusions: a) You must limit that conclusion somewhat. The sanctions (apparently) kept Saddam from making more WMDs, but they didn't stop him from violating other parts of the sanctions. b) Even if I were to grant the "proven success" (see above), that "success" was Not proven until after the invasion. c) What international law would that be? Most of what is though of as international law is, in actuality, a myth. Without enforcement, there is no law.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)