The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
the official god faq (caution, witty) :) by binabik2006-11-19 12:55:59
  the official athiest faq (caution, witty) :) by sstacks2004-09-24 06:47:46
    Methinks you missed the point of Atheism by wheresthefish2004-09-24 07:33:18
      I thought I hit the target, but who knows :) by sstacks2004-09-24 08:19:34
        Plenty of room for that... by Naruki2006-11-19 12:55:59
          More definitions :) by sstacks2004-09-24 08:44:09
            Am I the only one who sees by BloodyViking2004-09-24 10:05:29
              I didn't see such an implication by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:07:23
                Consider: There is nothing to deny without by BloodyViking2004-09-24 11:17:59
                  In other words by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:25:20
                    Ah, but you expressed both as assertions. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 11:35:36
                      Considering that the word itself by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:49:09
                        No it isn't, and no. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 12:01:26
                          In that case by Matthewdba2004-09-24 12:04:50
                            That's when you get into the "strong" and "weak" by Naruki 2004-09-24 12:15:45
definitions. They _would_ be a "weak atheist" by those definitions, but not a "strong atheist".

Another example would be a newborn baby.

For my regular usage, I do not consider someone who hasn't thought about the concept to be an atheist. Nor, on the other hand, do I consider them to be a theist.
[ Reply ]
                              That agrees with my understanding by Matthewdba2004-09-24 12:18:12
                                That's the point. by Naruki2004-09-24 12:24:39

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)