The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
the official god faq (caution, witty) :) by binabik 2006-11-19 12:55:59
clicky

i just received this link on a different forum. :)

please excuse me if this has been posted before. :)

[ Reply ]
  Not quite as witty as a sheet of drywall (n/t) by kiroh2004-09-24 04:58:38
    True. Almost, but not quite as funny. (n/t) by BaruMonkey2004-09-24 05:18:50
  Just a box of rain - by saoi2004-09-24 05:42:58
  the official athiest faq (caution, witty) :) by sstacks2004-09-24 06:47:46
    Ack! Typo :) Athiest = Atheist (n/t) by sstacks2004-09-24 06:51:37
    Methinks you missed the point of Atheism by wheresthefish2004-09-24 07:33:18
      Exactly by Control2004-09-24 07:39:56
        Ya know, by wheresthefish2004-09-24 07:51:43
          You're right, I apologize by Control2004-09-24 07:55:24
        Then it would also be prudent to state it as such by JustnCase2004-09-24 07:57:30
          The earth revolves around the sun. by Naruki2004-09-24 08:08:14
            Well THAT depends on your frame of reference. (n/t by McNutcase2004-09-24 08:12:11
              I am the centre of the Universe! by wheresthefish2004-09-24 08:13:44
                I thought that was Harvard professors? by Matthewdba2004-09-24 08:33:00
                You are FAT! by Naruki2004-09-24 08:39:11
                  No I'm not. by wheresthefish2004-09-24 08:46:27
                    applause! by saminz2004-09-24 08:47:23
                      Eyethankyew (n/t) by wheresthefish2004-09-24 08:49:05
        Atheism: Straight from the Source by sstacks2004-09-24 08:27:59
      I thought I hit the target, but who knows :) by sstacks2004-09-24 08:19:34
        Plenty of room for that... by Naruki2006-11-19 12:55:59
          More definitions :) by sstacks2004-09-24 08:44:09
            Am I the only one who sees by BloodyViking2004-09-24 10:05:29
              No you are not the only one to notice by cristobal2004-09-24 10:07:28
              Just so ya know... by sstacks2004-09-24 10:14:34
                Oh, I wasn't blaming you. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 10:35:28
                There are a couple of the biased ones. by Naruki2004-09-24 10:55:35
                  I don't see the counter bias in the first. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 11:19:44
              I didn't see such an implication by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:07:23
                Consider: There is nothing to deny without by BloodyViking2004-09-24 11:17:59
                  In other words by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:25:20
                    Ah, but you expressed both as assertions. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 11:35:36
                      Considering that the word itself by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:49:09
                        LOL I was waiting for that ;> (n/t) by sstacks2004-09-24 12:00:25
                        No it isn't, and no. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 12:01:26
                          In that case by Matthewdba2004-09-24 12:04:50
                            That's when you get into the "strong" and "weak" by Naruki2004-09-24 12:15:45
                              That agrees with my understanding by Matthewdba2004-09-24 12:18:12
                                That's the point. by Naruki2004-09-24 12:24:39
                            Going by the original Greek, yes. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 12:36:19
                    If you reversed it, the theists would see it. by Naruki2004-09-24 11:35:42
                      I still don't see it by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:47:05
                        Do you deny the non-existence of God? by Naruki2004-09-24 12:13:23
                          I think I understand by Matthewdba2004-09-24 12:19:48
                            Exactly. by Naruki2004-09-24 12:21:49
                              Next question, then: by Matthewdba2004-09-24 12:31:03
                                Not necessarily, but possibly. by Naruki2004-09-24 13:43:55
                                I think you summed that up nicely. (n/t) by BloodyViking2004-09-24 13:58:15
                                Thanks. by Naruki2004-09-24 14:05:20
        I would call that an atheist by tigermouse2004-09-24 08:46:40
  The official Agnostic FAQ... by moongoddess2004-09-24 09:22:48
    No, no, no. by BloodyViking2004-09-24 10:00:31
      The Apathetic Agnostic FAQ by wheresthefish2004-09-24 10:04:38
        Not very good. by Naruki2004-09-24 10:58:30
          good distinction by Matthewdba2004-09-24 11:04:40
          OK. by wheresthefish2004-09-24 11:09:09

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)