|
Watch NOLAwitch foam at the mouth! | by toxin | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
This is an example of the way the moron in the | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 09:51:44 |
|
was that Jackson or Moore? (n/t) | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 10:34:43 |
|
Can you show proof Moore is deluded? | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:42:02 |
|
Its not all about major facts though | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 11:17:46 |
|
It's a little more than that. | by Illiad | 2004-09-22 11:25:32 |
|
I do wish Someone | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 11:29:44 |
|
The Truth? You want the Truth? | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:19:52 |
|
Not true. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 12:48:47 |
|
If the truth, or 'reality' as you call it, | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:54:02 |
|
In addition to Matthewdba's comments... | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 13:26:46 |
|
Heisenberg? | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 13:54:53 |
|
What does anyone Knowing it | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 14:38:24 |
|
In the Copenhagen interpretation, everything | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 14:59:30 |
|
Is that the "collapsing probability wave" theory? | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 15:07:00 |
| Yep, that'd be it. |
by HadEnuf |
2004-09-22 15:28:40 |
It isn't silly, though--it is in fact partially demonstrable (to be wholly demonstrable would require the ability to
observe mutually-exclusive outcomes).
In the Copenhagen interpretation, the wave function collapses to a single solution, dependent on observation.
In the Everett interpretation, the wave function collapses to an solution set, comprising multiple, simultaneously-
existing universes--one for each possible outcome. These universes can also merge: when their state becomes
identical, they become not only effectively, but in fact one and the same.
Strange as it may sound, the Everett interpretation is actually the simpler of the two!
--
HadEnuf?
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Thanks for jumping in. | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 15:45:43 |
