|
Watch NOLAwitch foam at the mouth! | by toxin | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
This is an example of the way the moron in the | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 09:51:44 |
|
was that Jackson or Moore? (n/t) | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 10:34:43 |
|
Can you show proof Moore is deluded? | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:42:02 |
|
Its not all about major facts though | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 11:17:46 |
|
It's a little more than that. | by Illiad | 2004-09-22 11:25:32 |
|
I do wish Someone | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 11:29:44 |
|
The Truth? You want the Truth? | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:19:52 |
|
Not true. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 12:48:47 |
|
If the truth, or 'reality' as you call it, | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:54:02 |
|
In addition to Matthewdba's comments... | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 13:26:46 |
|
In order to perceive the truth, the whole truth | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 13:47:02 |
|
You are doing the impossible! | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 13:53:36 |
|
That wasn't what I said, though. | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:14:10 |
| I see your mistake, now. Sorry I overlooked it |
by Naruki |
2004-09-22 14:23:25 |
at first. You mistakenly assume "the truth" in a given situation necessarily has to include "all of reality for ever and ever".
It doesn't.
Based on that assumption, you think that someone claiming to understand the truth in a given situation is misleading people who should naturally assume he means the truth of everything everywhere.
They shouldn't. What's more, they don't. Only unreasonable people would make that kind of silly assumption.
Given this new information, hopefully you will understand that your perceptions may be faulty in a given situation, or they may be accurate. Just because I perceive things differently does _not_ mean _both_ of us are wrong. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
What it means is, that | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:26:05 |
|
In certain limited situation, perhaps. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 14:29:17 |
|
How do you determine which category | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:43:36 |
