The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Watch NOLAwitch foam at the mouth! by toxin2006-11-19 12:55:59
  This is an example of the way the moron in the by NOLAWitch2004-09-22 09:51:44
    was that Jackson or Moore? (n/t) by shepmagoo2004-09-22 10:34:43
      Can you show proof Moore is deluded? by Naruki 2004-09-22 10:42:02
Not just by saying "He is! He is!"

But actually show any proof that he got major facts wrong?
[ Reply ]
        Psst, I think that one's a troll. No diary content by NOLAWitch2004-09-22 10:44:59
          So a troll is considered... by shepmagoo2004-09-22 10:55:19
            I don't think you're a troll. by Naruki2004-09-22 10:56:58
            Sorry. No, a troll is someone who posts crap by NOLAWitch2004-09-22 11:00:47
            Don't worry about it. by karaken122004-09-22 11:04:33
          It irks me when "no diary content" is used by BloodyViking2004-09-22 11:04:43
            No, it's simply one indicator of several. by NOLAWitch2004-09-22 11:07:37
        Its not all about major facts though by shepmagoo2004-09-22 11:17:46
          It's a little more than that. by Illiad2004-09-22 11:25:32
            I do wish Someone by BloodyViking2004-09-22 11:29:44
              Eh. Can't do that in modern society. by Illiad2004-09-22 11:32:01
                You're right, about agendae by HadEnuf2004-09-22 11:34:58
                  <nitpick> by Matthewdba2004-09-22 11:40:52
                    D'oh! Typing-by-habit of words, based . .. by HadEnuf2004-09-22 11:47:08
              The Truth? You want the Truth? by LurkerMo2004-09-22 12:19:52
                Not true. by Naruki2004-09-22 12:48:47
                  If the truth, or 'reality' as you call it, by LurkerMo2004-09-22 12:54:02
                    What does being relevant have to do with it? by Matthewdba2004-09-22 12:57:56
                      correction by Matthewdba2004-09-22 13:02:32
                        Can an unknown truth be called true? by LurkerMo2004-09-22 13:29:31
                          Of course it can. by BloodyViking2004-09-22 13:41:34
                            Except, of course, in Copenhagen by HadEnuf2004-09-22 13:48:41
                              But what happens when by BloodyViking2004-09-22 14:26:42
                                Then the two statements: by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:41:32
                                It doesn't. by BloodyViking2004-09-22 15:24:05
                            These philosophical differences _are_ important. by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:01:41
                              I never said that you could rely on Everybody by BloodyViking2004-09-22 14:31:40
                                I think we have already established that by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:50:05
                                Just because we cannot know the entirety by BloodyViking2004-09-22 15:05:05
                    In addition to Matthewdba's comments... by Naruki2004-09-22 13:26:46
                      In order to perceive the truth, the whole truth by LurkerMo2004-09-22 13:47:02
                        You are doing the impossible! by Naruki2004-09-22 13:53:36
                          That wasn't what I said, though. by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:14:10
                            I see your mistake, now. Sorry I overlooked it by Naruki2004-09-22 14:23:25
                              What it means is, that by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:26:05
                                In certain limited situation, perhaps. by Naruki2004-09-22 14:29:17
                                How do you determine which category by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:43:36
                      Heisenberg? by HadEnuf2004-09-22 13:54:53
                        I disagree. by Naruki2004-09-22 14:06:39
                          That is _so_ limited a view of the truth. by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:22:41
                            You are _so_ equivocating. by Naruki2004-09-22 14:26:51
                              What I don't understand is why you insist by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:39:15
                            What has any of that to do with by BloodyViking2004-09-22 14:45:14
                              The fact that there is an answer that is by LurkerMo2004-09-22 14:57:46
                                Some truths are relative, yes, but others by BloodyViking2004-09-22 15:22:55
                                Different observers *can* see a pin up or down by HadEnuf2004-09-22 15:32:28
                                Let's try a different example. by cencithomas2004-09-22 16:45:59
                          Ah, but until the pins stop moving . .. by HadEnuf2004-09-22 14:57:34
                        What does anyone Knowing it by BloodyViking2004-09-22 14:38:24
                          In the Copenhagen interpretation, everything by HadEnuf2004-09-22 14:59:30
                            Is that the "collapsing probability wave" theory? by BloodyViking2004-09-22 15:07:00
                              Yep, that'd be it. by HadEnuf2004-09-22 15:28:40
                                Thanks for jumping in. by LurkerMo2004-09-22 15:45:43
                          What does something being true for you by LurkerMo2004-09-22 15:00:33
                            Viewpoint only matters by BloodyViking2004-09-22 15:32:59
                  I believe he qualified that in his final... by bytemedammit2004-09-22 12:55:42
                    /s\on\one (n/t) by bytemedammit2004-09-22 12:56:37
                    Then he did it backward. by BloodyViking2004-09-22 13:16:58
                      How do you separate one from the other? (n/t) by LurkerMo2004-09-22 13:48:51
            "spinnery" by Matthewdba2004-09-22 11:32:02
              If only they'd turned to fiber arts by voxwoman2004-09-22 11:52:40
            But do the scales of bulls4 *need* balancing? by HadEnuf2004-09-22 11:32:35
              I think it does. by Illiad2004-09-22 11:34:16
                Unless, of course, . . . by HadEnuf2004-09-22 11:43:53
                  Given the history of the sheeple, that's too far by Tomo2004-09-22 12:31:09
                    But it too far really too far, or not far enough? by HadEnuf2004-09-22 13:35:55
              *giggle* by karaken122004-09-22 11:36:32
                I love that word too... by moongoddess2004-09-22 11:45:36
                Hadn't thought of 'original s(p)in' in isolation by HadEnuf2004-09-22 11:51:00

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)