|
Watch NOLAwitch foam at the mouth! | by toxin | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| This is an example of the way the moron in the |
by NOLAWitch |
2004-09-22 09:51:44 |
White House "supports the troops". Send them into a piece of crap, keep them after their tour of duty is up, then screw them in the keister with cuts in Veterans Administration benefits. My Sailor knows just how lucky he is to have my health insurance coverage rather than have to go to the VA and wait for care.
George W. Bush is the enemy of the soldier and the veteran. Those of you who vote for him based on his so-called support for the military are as deluded as Michael Jackson. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I'd hardly call that "foaming" | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 09:55:01 |
|
Furthermore, Bush has conducted the Iraq War | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 10:34:32 |
|
Please, do! | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 10:51:57 |
|
in re the economy | by voxwoman | 2004-09-22 11:03:29 |
|
My ersthile employer's stock did similarly . . . | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:26:59 |
|
all I had were worthless options | by voxwoman | 2004-09-22 11:44:53 |
|
It is convenient to blame him. However | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 10:04:30 |
|
So, you prefer a known quantity up your keister? | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 10:08:00 |
|
That's a rumor | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 10:15:23 |
|
But that's not really true. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:18:43 |
|
If his record is so good | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 10:34:29 |
|
Good evasion. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:40:25 |
|
Evasion? | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 11:04:14 |
|
Yes, evasion. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 11:48:03 |
|
All we really have here, is . . . | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:54:32 |
|
Well if you want bad votes | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 12:22:21 |
|
Of course there's doubt! | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 12:44:00 |
|
Now who's evading | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 13:15:45 |
|
According to thomas.loc.gov | by tigermouse | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Why did he vote for an underfunded project | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 18:03:43 |
|
No Child Left Behind | by tigermouse | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Kerry voted against the 87 billion for Iraq | by buddha | 2004-09-22 16:23:16 |
|
So what your saying is | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 18:01:46 |
|
No, I didn't say anything like that | by buddha | 2004-09-22 19:11:41 |
|
And *I'm* the spinner? | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 19:56:53 |
|
He had his inner ear destroyed. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 20:10:08 |
|
Holy crap, DR. | by Ravenlock | 2004-09-22 23:20:42 |
|
You've posted that several times | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 11:58:28 |
|
No proof | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 12:13:57 |
|
No | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 12:28:31 |
|
Now now now... | by DaNutBall | 2004-09-22 11:21:35 |
|
Obviously Bush is doing *something* good for | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:10:21 |
|
More radioactive contamination? | by voxwoman | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Yes! That's it! | by Tomo | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
It's not just him | by DarthSane | 2004-09-22 10:07:44 |
|
Go back at least as far as nixon... | by moongoddess | 2004-09-22 11:37:17 |
|
Nixon? Try pre-Washington! | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 12:00:21 |
|
was that Jackson or Moore? (n/t) | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 10:34:43 |
|
I typed Jackson so I meant Jackson, as in | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 10:37:47 |
|
Oooh Testy! | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 10:46:17 |
|
You're a fool then. As far as I know, Moore has | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 10:48:50 |
|
You're right, all Moore has molested | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 11:01:10 |
|
Do Bush didn't REALLY sit in that classroom | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:10:09 |
|
Seven minutes... Would it have made a difference | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Check link 3 again. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 11:56:14 |
|
Yes | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 12:05:23 |
|
Depends on if you believe | by tigermouse | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I remember being told about the first plane too | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 12:46:44 |
|
The FAA knew that several planes had been | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 12:53:16 |
|
The FAA knew | by DesertRat66 | 2004-09-22 17:53:53 |
|
He was the president, though | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 13:06:32 |
|
O.K. Stop the spin cycle | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Me stop the spin? | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 19:36:04 |
|
Got proof? | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 11:49:24 |
|
Moore never tried to hide that he was creating | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:33:25 |
|
Black and white | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 11:08:24 |
|
It's a shame you only acknowledge dichotomies | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:16:00 |
|
haha | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 11:19:23 |
|
See my post | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Plus the added bonus | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 11:27:25 |
|
Um, no that's not a pun. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:33:45 |
|
The feeling is mutual. | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 12:09:59 |
|
No, it's still not a pun. Do you not have a | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 12:20:39 |
|
I see | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 12:31:08 |
|
OK, if that's a pun, what do "Black and White" | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 12:36:38 |
|
What is with all the personal attacks? | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 13:00:08 |
|
Sorry, but that was no pun. | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 13:22:30 |
|
Now THIS is a pun: | by NOLAWitch | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Forgot '</Crocodile Dundee>'? (n/t) | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 13:45:02 |
|
Roight you are, mate. (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 13:45:36 |
|
oh alright | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 13:36:51 |
|
I think what you Meant to say was | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 11:22:45 |
|
Can you show proof Moore is deluded? | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:42:02 |
|
Psst, I think that one's a troll. No diary content | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 10:44:59 |
|
So a troll is considered... | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 10:55:19 |
|
I don't think you're a troll. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 10:56:58 |
|
Sorry. No, a troll is someone who posts crap | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:00:47 |
|
Don't worry about it. | by karaken12 | 2004-09-22 11:04:33 |
|
It irks me when "no diary content" is used | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 11:04:43 |
|
No, it's simply one indicator of several. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:07:37 |
|
Its not all about major facts though | by shepmagoo | 2004-09-22 11:17:46 |
|
It's a little more than that. | by Illiad | 2004-09-22 11:25:32 |
|
I do wish Someone | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 11:29:44 |
|
Eh. Can't do that in modern society. | by Illiad | 2004-09-22 11:32:01 |
|
You're right, about agendae | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:34:58 |
|
<nitpick> | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 11:40:52 |
|
D'oh! Typing-by-habit of words, based . .. | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:47:08 |
|
The Truth? You want the Truth? | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:19:52 |
|
Not true. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 12:48:47 |
|
If the truth, or 'reality' as you call it, | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 12:54:02 |
|
What does being relevant have to do with it? | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 12:57:56 |
|
correction | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 13:02:32 |
|
Can an unknown truth be called true? | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 13:29:31 |
|
Of course it can. | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 13:41:34 |
|
Except, of course, in Copenhagen | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 13:48:41 |
|
But what happens when | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 14:26:42 |
|
Then the two statements: | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:41:32 |
|
It doesn't. | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 15:24:05 |
|
These philosophical differences _are_ important. | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:01:41 |
|
I never said that you could rely on Everybody | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 14:31:40 |
|
I think we have already established that | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:50:05 |
|
Just because we cannot know the entirety | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 15:05:05 |
|
In addition to Matthewdba's comments... | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 13:26:46 |
|
In order to perceive the truth, the whole truth | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 13:47:02 |
|
You are doing the impossible! | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 13:53:36 |
|
That wasn't what I said, though. | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:14:10 |
|
I see your mistake, now. Sorry I overlooked it | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 14:23:25 |
|
What it means is, that | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:26:05 |
|
In certain limited situation, perhaps. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 14:29:17 |
|
How do you determine which category | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:43:36 |
|
Heisenberg? | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 13:54:53 |
|
I disagree. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 14:06:39 |
|
That is _so_ limited a view of the truth. | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:22:41 |
|
You are _so_ equivocating. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 14:26:51 |
|
What I don't understand is why you insist | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:39:15 |
|
What has any of that to do with | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 14:45:14 |
|
The fact that there is an answer that is | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 14:57:46 |
|
Some truths are relative, yes, but others | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 15:22:55 |
|
Different observers *can* see a pin up or down | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 15:32:28 |
|
Let's try a different example. | by cencithomas | 2004-09-22 16:45:59 |
|
Ah, but until the pins stop moving . .. | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 14:57:34 |
|
What does anyone Knowing it | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 14:38:24 |
|
In the Copenhagen interpretation, everything | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 14:59:30 |
|
Is that the "collapsing probability wave" theory? | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 15:07:00 |
|
Yep, that'd be it. | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 15:28:40 |
|
Thanks for jumping in. | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 15:45:43 |
|
What does something being true for you | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 15:00:33 |
|
Viewpoint only matters | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 15:32:59 |
|
I believe he qualified that in his final... | by bytemedammit | 2004-09-22 12:55:42 |
|
/s\on\one (n/t) | by bytemedammit | 2004-09-22 12:56:37 |
|
Then he did it backward. | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 13:16:58 |
|
How do you separate one from the other? (n/t) | by LurkerMo | 2004-09-22 13:48:51 |
|
"spinnery" | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 11:32:02 |
|
If only they'd turned to fiber arts | by voxwoman | 2004-09-22 11:52:40 |
|
But do the scales of bulls4 *need* balancing? | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:32:35 |
|
I think it does. | by Illiad | 2004-09-22 11:34:16 |
|
Unless, of course, . . . | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:43:53 |
|
Given the history of the sheeple, that's too far | by Tomo | 2004-09-22 12:31:09 |
|
But it too far really too far, or not far enough? | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 13:35:55 |
|
*giggle* | by karaken12 | 2004-09-22 11:36:32 |
|
I love that word too... | by moongoddess | 2004-09-22 11:45:36 |
|
Hadn't thought of 'original s(p)in' in isolation | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 11:51:00 |
|
Oh, c'mon, seriously | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 11:15:42 |
|
Friendly? | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 11:26:35 |
|
Well | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 11:41:57 |
|
1 - they are dying. They were sent there | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 12:01:22 |
|
there's a difference | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 12:14:56 |
|
On retirement/discharge | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 14:34:04 |
|
OK, speaking as a veteran | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 12:26:17 |
|
Sorry, half of that is claptrap. | by Tomo | 2004-09-22 12:38:06 |
|
I beg to differ | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 14:29:51 |
|
No, you can't. | by Tomo | 2004-09-22 14:49:53 |
|
OK, smartie pants. ;-) | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 18:17:13 |
|
Oh, and I failed to mention: | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 14:31:47 |
|
I am not using receiving a disability as a | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:28:10 |
|
Strange | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 11:43:43 |
|
NOLA didn't say VA funding specifically. | by Tomo | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Actually, she did, Tomo: | by RedmondBOFH | 2004-09-22 14:23:18 |
|
Sorry, sorry! I was only joking! I did not mean | by toxin | 2004-09-22 11:33:31 |
|
The true psychos are the chickenhawks in | by NOLAWitch | 2004-09-22 11:37:08 |
|
Fruitcakes aren't always nutty | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 11:39:01 |
|
Good ones are, though | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 11:45:59 |
|
Soaked in a dark rum, ye says? | by karaken12 | 2004-09-22 12:05:00 |
|
Aye | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 12:31:48 |
|
My sister's comment on fruitcakes | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 12:10:01 |
|
When in doubt, throw it out | by blindman | 2004-09-22 12:25:23 |
|
Oh, no | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 12:30:47 |
|
We soak the whole cake in rum | by Matthewdba | 2004-09-22 12:43:05 |
|
That too | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 12:51:40 |
|
As long as you take the fruitcake... | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 12:51:56 |
|
Others have said that | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 13:09:26 |
|
Zombies don't count. | by Naruki | 2004-09-22 13:28:35 |
|
Indeed | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 14:15:48 |
|
You have a legion of fruitcake minions? | by BloodyViking | 2004-09-22 13:31:11 |
|
Nah, they'll probably just sing along . . . | by HadEnuf | 2004-09-22 13:59:26 |
|
You must be one of them! | by tigermouse | 2004-09-22 14:15:07 |