The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

WinXP vs. 16 bit compatability mode... by Myke2004-09-22 09:22:20
  How ancient a WinFax? by LthrOttr 2004-09-22 09:32:59
Reason I ask... if it is one of the REALLY early version (as in not truly compatible with Windows 95 and above) you may encounter a problem. Under 95 and above, and particularly under XP, to get to the modem the program just about has to go through the TAPI.DLL (Telephony Application Programming Interface). Under 95 and 98, an earlier software package could "shove" TAPI aside and directly access the hardware a lot of the time (prior to Windows 95, that was the only way you talked to the modem). However, XP does tend to fight back. This may be part of the problem. So, if it is version of WinFax before the versions compatible with XP, you may be somewhat out of luck. Only thing I can think of is un-install the modem from windows and KEEP IT UNINSTALLED so that TAPI can't see it, and see if you can get the version of WinFax to activate it. If that's the problem.<BRE>
Hmmm... re-reading your post as I type this, I wonder whether WinFax is trying to do a call to an IPX modem share (such as in the early days of network modems that were shared via Novell). If so, you may be in for no end of head-aches. I'll try to check some of my ancient documentation when I get to work (I'm running late and haven't left home yet [9:30 server time... I'll make it up at the end of my day]).

Only thoughts that are coming to mind for me at the moment.

LthrOttr
[ Reply ]
    Further... by Didactylos2004-09-22 09:49:02

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)