The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Grr. 4.7 == 4.377. by tnglives2004-09-22 07:21:12
  The sad thing is by Liava2004-09-22 07:27:45
    Erm, no, they DON'T. by McNutcase2004-09-22 07:33:25
      Computers don't read the spec sheet by version0.12004-09-22 07:37:20
        The thing is... by BrainBug2004-09-22 07:45:59
          That's why I said that address space is binary by version0.12004-09-22 08:01:09
            I don't think you quite understood what he by Liava 2004-09-22 08:14:20
was saying. It's not so much a problem with modern computers because generally, a processor's address space is larger than the amount of RAM it will sensibly have. He was using a simple computer that could address only 1,048,576 bytes of memory. Given that, if you put a 1,000,000 byte chip into the computer, then you have wasted 48,576 bytes of the address space.

Furthermore, if you stack two 500,000 byte chips, then the memory bus must do division to figure out which chip it must access. If each chip is guaranteed to have an amount of memory that is an even power of two, then the memory bus can figure out which chip to access simply by bit shifting and comparing. This is very important for two reasons: it reduces the complexity of the memory bus, and it makes it faster. You don't have to implement division logic, and a bit shift is significantly faster than a division. The reason is that the fastest known division algorithm is a variation on long division that you learned in high school, so division of a 32-bit number by an n-bit number requires approximately (32 - n) bit shifts and subtractions/additions.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)