| It's taken me a long time to get to this point, but I've finally come to the conclusion that DR will not ever back down on his stance. This include ever admitting that he is wrong on any of his supporting points, even when he clearly is.
For whatever reason, he sees the removal of Saddam as a Great Thing that can not be affected by the facts or events prior to, during or after the invasion of Iraq. On this topic, his logic goes out the window and he has continually reverted to manipulative tactics and tosses logical fallacies over the debate like they were confetti.
The reason for the latter is, I think, obvious.
My own recommendation is to simply do as I do. Ignore any of his posts that contain the words "Iraq" or "Bush" in them. Leopards don't change their spots. |
