UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

I shouldn't watch gay marriage debates.	by Illiad	2004-07-14 15:38:47
It's all about the constituency	by gblues	2004-07-14 17:17:13
I'm gonna have to disagree with you, there.	by Naruki	2004-07-14 18:07:17
isn't that what I said?	by gblues	2004-07-14 18:20:09
You said to call gay marriages something else.	by Naruki	2004-07-14 18:27:40
You have no idea what "separate but equal" means.	by gblues	2004-07-14 22:30:54
"Separate but equal" refers to segregationist dogma that was used to justify separate white/black schools, restrooms, drinking fountains, bus seats, etc. It has absolutely nothing to do with creating hierarchal classifications--or do you think that it is wrong to differentiate between breeds of dogs? Or between flavors of soda? Ice cream? Coffee blends? Do you mean to say that simply referring to someone as Black or Hispanic creates a "separate but equal" situation? Let's put it in code terms. Currently the Law object has a CivilUnion() method and a Marriage() method. CivilUnion() is used infrequently due to inconsistent implementation across states. So most states use the Marriage() method instead. Marriage has two parameters: a Man object and a Woman object. Now let's say you want to implement a more robust CivilUnion(). Most of the code you want is already in Marriage(), so we just move that code into CivilUnion() and turn Marriage() into a wrapper for CivilUnion(). Now the government is free to implement other wrappers for male/male and female/female civil unions. Nathan
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)