Circumcision is not solely a religious practice, it is also a medical one.
If an amendment were passed, however, saying that all citizens MUST be circumcised at birth, without any justification given for that amendment other than "God says so", would you not consider that amendment in violation of the First Amendment?
Circumcision is not solely religious, but they would be requiring it for solely religious reasons.
Marriage is not solely religious, but here they are talking about forbidding it for solely religious reasons. |
