The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

GOP vows to ban same-sex marriage by FireballMatt2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Santorum is such a pr*ck! by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 06:48:15
    What pisses me off the most about these @$$holes by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 07:30:16
      Doesn't parse for me by DesertRat662004-07-14 08:21:51
        Um, Sorry. The proposed amendment does violate by talon07202004-07-14 09:11:52
          That someone of DesertRat66's intelligence by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 09:19:47
            I can see his point. by BloodyViking2004-07-14 10:31:01
              It does impose a religious act: marginalizing and by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 10:33:39
                How is that religious? by BloodyViking2004-07-14 10:47:52
                  They are using their religion to justify their by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 10:55:50
                    But that is different by BloodyViking2004-07-14 11:04:07
                      Then use Slippery Slope argument. by Naruki 2004-07-14 12:27:47
Allowing Religious dogma to be the basis for any law provides a precedent for expanding that practice.

Ultimately, if the only basis for a law is religion, then it _is_ a religious law, and thus helps to promote one or more religions over one or more other religious beliefs.
[ Reply ]
                        Is the dogma the basis for the law by BloodyViking2004-07-14 12:33:16
                          A bit off all of the above, don't you think? (n/t) by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 12:35:39
                            s/off/of (n/t) by NOLAWitch2004-07-14 12:35:50
                          What NOLA said. by Naruki2004-07-14 13:03:02

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)