|
GOP vows to ban same-sex marriage | by FireballMatt | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Santorum is such a pr*ck! | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 06:48:15 |
|
What pisses me off the most about these @$$holes | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 07:30:16 |
|
Doesn't parse for me | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 08:21:51 |
|
Yes it DOES violate the First Amendment in | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 08:33:50 |
|
Once again | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 09:21:28 |
|
I told you why. | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| O.K. I'll ask another question |
by DesertRat66 |
2004-07-14 09:49:32 |
that will hopefully illustrate my point. It's a little extreme so I appologize in advance.
Some ancient religions practiced human sacrifice. Should the United States, under your interpretation of the First Ammendment, allow that practice should some people wish to revive those religions? If not why not? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
No, because THAT would be establishing a | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 09:56:29 |
|
ummm | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 10:01:22 |
|
Re: the victim | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:14:30 |
|
And that is why | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 10:40:30 |
|
The difference being... | by Naruki | 2004-07-14 11:27:05 |
|
No, because we have a SECULAR | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:00:51 |
|
What secular reasoning? | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 10:09:36 |
|
We've had this debate before. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:15:04 |
|
I probably wasn't | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Um, the First Commandment is: "Thou shalt have | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:29:46 |
|
LOL. Nicely done. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:32:53 |
|
If he hadn't posted it at least twice, I was going | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:35:44 |
|
My mistake | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 10:37:03 |
|
<Dorothy>Here's your oil can!</Dorothy> (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:39:45 |
|
Man, when the tin man shows up, | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:40:52 |
|
Since you lost your stuffing, that makes you the | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:41:45 |
|
I dunno... | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:44:01 |
|
But the point of the movie was that they | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:46:24 |
|
...Hunh. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:50:03 |
|
Lemme clarify. Hopefully this'll work. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:31:32 |
|
s/it's is/it's. Can't type to save my life today. (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:33:44 |
|
*gives Ravenlock's stuffing back* | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:36:47 |
|
Whew! We'll try it with that. Thanks! ;-) (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:38:21 |
|
Hitting the brakes and hitting them hard | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
NOLAwitch please read ^^^ (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 11:27:06 |
|
Yes, it was my assumption... | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 11:33:52 |
|
By the way, | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 11:39:55 |
|
s/what where/was where. *Sigh* :-p (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 11:40:16 |
|
What tipped me off | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 11:46:34 |
|
Group hug. ;-) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 11:47:43 |
|
In that case | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 11:40:14 |
|
I agree, and I wonder too. ;-) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 11:40:56 |
|
My take... | by Naruki | 2004-07-14 11:40:00 |
|
I assumed that "legal incidents thereof" | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 11:43:34 |
|
Support for that, though I don't... | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
i guess that means then | by gibuu | 2004-07-14 13:34:22 |
|
Those words "legal incidents" DO enable the | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 11:43:52 |
|
Now that I have read the ammendment | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 11:51:50 |
|
Elections should be easy enough: dump the | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 11:57:46 |
|
Problem is | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 12:02:09 |
|
I second the motion. All in favor say "Aye". (n/t | by talon0720 | 2004-07-14 14:02:28 |
|
RE: Concerning another question | by Canoso | 2004-07-14 10:04:34 |
|
...Women's lib "wasn't a big issue", | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:06:52 |
|
RE: | by Canoso | 2004-07-14 10:11:04 |
|
*LART* Matthew Shepard. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:13:19 |
|
RE: Matther Shepard | by Canoso | 2004-07-14 10:16:11 |
|
Their persecution is worse than you seem to think. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:18:36 |
|
RE: | by Canoso | 2004-07-14 10:32:18 |
|
On left or right | by DesertRat66 | 2004-07-14 10:47:37 |
|
RE: Left/right | by canoso | 2004-07-14 11:06:34 |
|
You're probably not that active because... | by Naruki | 2004-07-14 12:07:54 |
|
RE: active | by Canoso | 2004-07-15 09:27:09 |
|
Yeah, like one of my coworkers was going on and on | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:53:00 |
|
RE: Coworkers | by canoso | 2004-07-14 11:03:17 |
|
What's worse than the Shepard case? | by Naruki | 2004-07-14 12:05:12 |
|
Doh. Um, yeah. (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 12:08:50 |
|
I'm doing well on the ideas today. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 12:10:59 |
|
*hugs the stuffing out of Ravenlock* | by NOLAWitch | 2004-07-14 10:11:20 |
|
Thanks. Can I have the stuffing back? | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-14 10:19:36 |
|
Wrong. | by Naruki | 2004-07-14 11:42:39 |