The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Link not working but.... by Kickstart 2004-07-14 08:00:44
From Drudge Report:
Texas couple 'arrested for wearing anti-Bush shirts' at a July 4 rally...

If anyone has a working link, please post it.

KS
[ Reply ]
  Google News has it too, by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:09:04
    Arrest and attemped cover-up rolled into one! (n/t) by BaruMonkey2004-07-14 08:12:01
    You mean this one? by imrambi2006-11-19 12:55:59
      It doesn't say that. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:15:03
        handcuffs for trespassing by SnappingTurtle2004-07-14 08:19:14
          Picture link by plblark2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Found 2 by uplatecoding2006-11-19 12:55:59
    That first one has a good summary, thanks. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:19:31
      Ummm by imrambi2004-07-14 08:36:03
        They were wearing. Tee. Shirts. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:44:23
          Yes, but by Feng_Li2004-07-14 08:53:20
            I agree. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:55:13
              But it's not really surprising by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 09:01:38
                Quite possibly. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 09:08:42
                  Uhm, I'm not. by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 09:23:21
                    Fair 'nuf. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 09:27:25
                    I don't think Bush started it, but I think by buddha2004-07-14 09:49:07
                  Wearing those t-shirts at a Bush event by LurkerMo2004-07-14 09:49:14
                    Bull. by Kickstart2004-07-14 11:48:52
                      Thank. You. (n/t) by mortaine2004-07-14 15:08:10
                        No problem. by Kickstart2004-07-14 15:49:00
              According to the article by Feng_Li2004-07-14 09:13:59
                According to which article, exactly? by Ravenlock2004-07-14 09:26:08
                  This one here. by Feng_Li2006-11-19 12:55:59
                    Okay, thanks. by Ravenlock2004-07-14 09:56:47
                      Not conflicting, just less information. by buddha2004-07-14 10:03:06
                        Nope your right, I missed the line of by buddha2004-07-14 10:04:46
                          OK, I've been researching by tigermouse2004-07-14 10:50:21
            Again, they had tickets by tigermouse2004-07-14 09:03:49
        No matter how far away the "protest zone" is? by Naruki2004-07-14 11:11:08
  Yeah, by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 08:15:27
    So when someone tries to take away your rights by buddha2004-07-14 08:31:30
      Yes, by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 08:44:37
        *cheers* (n/t) by Funky_Monkey2004-07-14 08:45:12
        They had tickets to the event, I didn't see by buddha2004-07-14 08:49:16
          Zounds by tigermouse2004-07-14 08:52:09
            almost, that is (n/t) by tigermouse2004-07-14 08:52:31
          And always has been by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 08:53:02
            LOL, I have a bridge to sell you! (n/t) by buddha2004-07-14 08:54:18
            When Bush was in L.A. last year by buddha2004-07-14 09:09:31
              What does last year by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 09:14:52
                It establishes a pattern of behavior by HeyRef2004-07-14 09:36:53
                  Firts article wasn't clear by hyzenthlay2004-07-14 10:28:48
                Since I couldn't find anything on where the by buddha2004-07-14 09:38:11
              Free speech != Right to be televised. by LurkerMo2004-07-14 09:35:53
                I didn't say they could disrupt Bush. by buddha2004-07-14 10:06:40
        They had tickets to the event by tigermouse2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Google returns a few links by Cokish2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Drudge by keszpo2004-07-14 08:26:15
    Yes, but in this case... by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:27:58
      Even a broken clock is right twice a day. (n/t) by nin_man2004-07-14 08:45:08
        Yup. (n/t) by Ravenlock2004-07-14 08:45:59
  FWIW, the same thing happened under Clinton by SnappingTurtle2004-07-14 08:38:46
    Of course not by DesertRat662004-07-14 09:10:39
      Well, my objection is to the location... by Ravenlock2004-07-14 09:29:26
        What I would like to see by DesertRat662004-07-14 09:35:26
          That sounds downright dangerous. by LurkerMo2004-07-14 09:41:39
            Under the right conditions by DesertRat662004-07-14 09:52:41
              OK, maybe not impossible. But tell me, by LurkerMo2004-07-14 09:59:55
                Because it would remove the hypocrisy... by Ravenlock2004-07-14 10:03:57
                  Not just that by DesertRat662004-07-14 10:31:18
                    "hypothetical President" by Illiad2004-07-14 11:30:37
                      Are you kidding?!?! by DesertRat662004-07-14 11:33:29
                        Also by DesertRat662004-07-14 11:34:23
          Nixon did that once by SnappingTurtle2004-07-14 10:50:00

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)