|
Attn: Naruki | by Ravenlock | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
To distinguish... | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 10:23:09 |
|
And I think your characterization is wrong. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 10:50:50 |
|
Can anyone claim to speak for what | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 11:57:33 |
|
Attempt at answers. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 12:11:38 |
| Well... |
by Naruki |
2004-07-12 12:44:03 |
That caveat for #2 would be irrational (though quite probable) and thus tossed out. We don't get to pick which sins are "too much" to determine your faith. Only God does. So, #2 have Free Will to do good without being forced. Interesting.
#3 is SOL. As I argued, they don't have Free Will, obviously. They'd better get busy doing good things ASAP.
#4 seems to be too undefined to treat with. The dismissers are irrational, of course, and can be dismissed from this discussion. Those who believe that you must repent (whether the priest is there or not) have no Free Will. Those who don't think that, well, they either fit in #2 or they're just plain undefined (probably irrational).
"Not opposed" sounds much like "don't want to hurt anyone by exclusion". Maybe you just haven't thought about it enough. You are clearly holding mutually exclusive views, to a degree. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Not "haven't thought about it." "Don't know." | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 12:58:00 |
|
What I meant was that you currently hold | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 13:07:12 |
|
*Shrug* I went through "Battleground God" | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 14:09:19 |
|
Nobody *knows* the rules. So what? | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 14:14:37 |
|
Why? | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 14:27:49 |
|
The "He" for God is arbitrary, by the way. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 14:29:44 |
|
Maybe it's a canine gender. | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 14:35:45 |
|
:-p (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 14:55:26 |
|
Ah... | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 14:35:08 |
|
Sorry I didn't make it more clear. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 14:55:03 |
|
It's not inconsistent... | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 14:58:19 |
|
You haven't stated... | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 15:03:09 |
|
Didn't want to be redundant. | by Naruki | 2004-07-12 15:23:58 |
|
Fair enough. :-p | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 15:28:51 |
|
And you're probably right. | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 15:29:40 |
|
Actually, one more clarification... | by Ravenlock | 2004-07-12 15:39:33 |