The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
What do you think? by amanita2006-11-19 12:55:59
  How old is all the kids? by Reddy2004-05-11 13:56:55
    The women ought to have tubals to go with it. by NOLAWitch2004-05-11 13:59:53
      I'll agree by Reddy2004-05-11 14:01:40
        That irks my cookies too. It really honks me off by NOLAWitch2004-05-11 14:04:56
          Ah, the Right to Life movement. by amanita2004-05-11 14:10:33
            It's definitely related. by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 14:15:51
              That does not compute. by BloodyViking2004-05-11 14:31:12
                I believe the problem by rshepard2004-05-11 14:40:10
                  By that argument by BloodyViking2004-05-11 14:43:46
                    In a sense, they do. by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 14:56:19
                      But there is a big difference. by Naruki2004-05-11 15:02:27
                        We should let him because by rshepard2004-05-11 15:13:31
                          He is Already not supporting the children by BloodyViking2004-05-11 15:18:22
                            Not naive--it's the law. by rshepard2004-05-11 15:52:29
                              Nope. He's already been PROVEN guilty. by Naruki2004-05-11 18:28:07
                                He's already been proven guilty by thewrongcrowd 2006-11-19 12:55:59
for nonsupport, but not for fathering children, as chrisP pointed out earlier.

If the judge wants to punish him for nonsupport, fine, garnish his wages, make him work a second job, make him go hungry and barefoot for 15 days to see what his kids are going through.
[ Reply ]
                                But that is why he can't have MORE kids. by Naruki2004-05-11 21:17:36

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)