The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

What do you think? by amanita2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Good for the judge to order vasectomies. by NOLAWitch2004-05-11 13:40:59
    Wait 'til a judge orders a welfare mom to abort. (n/t) by leistico2004-05-11 15:37:10
      here they don't do that but they have age by Celticess 2004-05-11 16:35:23
limits. Once a child is over 2 if you aren't disabled you must work. Some scummy people will have babies to just keep on it.(I know the person that used to rent this house I'm in admitted to doing just that one day) Also they cap how much child tax benifit you get back I think so after awhile it's not that productive to have tons of rugrats. Also it's required if your on benifits and seperated that a court order is made for maintance. If any amount over $400 is got per month the government pockets that as reimbursement for the benifits they pay out.(ie you can only earn $400/mo and over that they take it all or a precent... I forget which) Further they will pressure both parents to work particularly as they see only one needs to care for that baby under 2. If the parents look in a questionable state or the children seem such schools can phone and complain and families be investigated and children taken. What happens then is if they want their children back they get forced into parenting courses and proving fitness as a parent. Then they give them back.(which I think is still questionable in some cases as this one woman I know got her kid back, ran to the UK using her dual citizenship and now is on benifits there... unable to care for the babies she has, still having more and her husbands parents and the system have to support her there ick)
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)