The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
What do you think? by amanita2006-11-19 12:55:59
  How old is all the kids? by Reddy2004-05-11 13:56:55
    The women ought to have tubals to go with it. by NOLAWitch2004-05-11 13:59:53
      I'll agree by Reddy2004-05-11 14:01:40
        That irks my cookies too. It really honks me off by NOLAWitch2004-05-11 14:04:56
          Ah, the Right to Life movement. by amanita 2004-05-11 14:10:33
I don't even want to go there.

But I think the "deciding who gets to procreate" thing is somewhat related. I guess that's the part that bothers me -- it reminds me a little of the folks who say that it doesn't matter *what* happens, abortion is against their religion so no one should be allowed to have one. Because there are definitely people who shouldn't have children, but like you I don't see anyone stepping up to adopt their offspring.
[ Reply ]
            It's definitely related. by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 14:15:51
              Not really. by Naruki2004-05-11 14:29:24
                Consider by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 14:38:01
                  How do you condemn someone to life? by Naruki2004-05-11 14:50:41
                    It's not quite as easy. by chrisP2004-05-11 15:05:31
                      So set the bar high. by Naruki2004-05-11 15:12:54
                      That isn't what it says at all. by BloodyViking2004-05-11 15:14:46
                        And that's not the way laws usually are made. by chrisP2004-05-11 16:05:31
                          Not quite by BloodyViking2004-05-12 06:29:04
                    i didnt see where by gibuu2004-05-11 15:33:16
                    I can think of a few scenarios... by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 18:54:50
                      Nope. by Naruki2004-05-11 21:20:14
              That does not compute. by BloodyViking2004-05-11 14:31:12
                Oh that's easy. by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 14:39:13
                  They already do that by BloodyViking2004-05-11 14:50:46
                I believe the problem by rshepard2004-05-11 14:40:10
                  By that argument by BloodyViking2004-05-11 14:43:46
                    In a sense, they do. by thewrongcrowd2004-05-11 14:56:19
                      But there is a big difference. by Naruki2004-05-11 15:02:27
                        We should let him because by rshepard2004-05-11 15:13:31
                          He is Already not supporting the children by BloodyViking2004-05-11 15:18:22
                            What job does this guy have? by Reddy2004-05-11 15:23:47
                              I should think that's obvious... by Naruki2004-05-11 15:25:42
                                lol (nt) by gibuu2004-05-11 15:35:41
                            Not naive--it's the law. by rshepard2004-05-11 15:52:29
                              Nope. He's already been PROVEN guilty. by Naruki2004-05-11 18:28:07
                                He's already been proven guilty by thewrongcrowd2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                But that is why he can't have MORE kids. by Naruki2004-05-11 21:17:36
                          BAD LOGIC! No cookie for you. by Naruki2004-05-11 15:19:12
                            Not sure its bad logic.. by rshepard2004-05-11 15:38:49
                              It's not a question of logic at all. by chrisP2004-05-11 15:50:16
                                There is an offense though. by BloodyViking2004-05-12 06:36:38
                      But privacy and self-determination by BloodyViking2004-05-11 15:04:28
            So what I'm hearing is... by Spud312004-05-11 14:18:04

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)