| What do you think? |
by amanita |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
This is a hard one! On one hand, I don't think people should have kids if they can't support them. (Or that stupid people should be allowed to have them, period LOL) But who decides the definition of "support" or "stupid" -- I don't think I want it in the hands of the government.
(Can you tell I'm reading the "news" currently?)
click |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Good for the judge to order vasectomies. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-05-11 13:40:59 |
|
And I was just about to post a follow-up | by amanita | 2004-05-11 13:42:08 |
|
Do you really think it's hard to tell that those | by NOLAWitch | 2004-05-11 13:43:17 |
|
No, I agree completely. | by amanita | 2004-05-11 13:45:05 |
|
No way. | by nin_man | 2004-05-11 13:50:26 |
|
Where did you get | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 14:08:31 |
|
No, not her. | by nin_man | 2004-05-11 14:35:48 |
|
Gotcha. :-) | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 14:41:03 |
|
Laura posed nekkid? | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 14:51:29 |
|
You know how to use Google, I think. | by nin_man | 2004-05-11 15:03:39 |
|
she also had an affair didn't she and her son | by Celticess | 2004-05-11 16:22:25 |
|
Although I am in favor of licensing parents, | by NOLAWitch | 2004-05-11 13:50:46 |
|
I'm in favour of parent training, family | by Celticess | 2004-05-11 14:21:53 |
|
too bad they don't | by Celticess | 2004-05-11 14:18:57 |
|
Wait 'til a judge orders a welfare mom to abort. (n/t) | by leistico | 2004-05-11 15:37:10 |
|
Now *that*... | by Arivia | 2004-05-11 15:39:06 |
|
here they don't do that but they have age | by Celticess | 2004-05-11 16:35:23 |
|
If he is enough of a deadbeat dad | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 13:44:58 |
|
And while we're at it, | by LionsPhil | 2004-05-11 13:47:42 |
|
And kids shouldn't be able to pray at school. | by Spud31 | 2004-05-11 13:50:25 |
|
Free speech isn't | by hyzenthlay | 2004-05-11 13:55:18 |
|
Well sure, | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 13:55:39 |
|
Okay, so if he's not permitted to procreate . . . | by amanita | 2004-05-11 14:01:57 |
|
Sterilization. | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 14:38:56 |
|
how about this: | by zelda | 2004-05-11 16:31:08 |
|
Nice thought. Now think about how to enforce | by LurkerMo | 2004-05-11 16:50:11 |
|
give 'em a choice | by zelda | 2004-05-11 18:03:02 |
|
I HATE that the ACLU thinks | by hyzenthlay | 2004-05-11 13:53:27 |
|
Damn skippy | by Illiad | 2004-05-11 14:04:33 |
|
The judge is wrong. | by rshepard | 2004-05-11 13:53:38 |
|
The only "reasonable effort" after that to prevent | by NOLAWitch | 2004-05-11 13:58:52 |
|
How old is all the kids? | by Reddy | 2004-05-11 13:56:55 |
|
The women ought to have tubals to go with it. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-05-11 13:59:53 |
|
I'll agree | by Reddy | 2004-05-11 14:01:40 |
|
Another case of our government making | by amanita | 2004-05-11 14:03:33 |
|
they usually do (n/t) | by Reddy | 2004-05-11 14:04:51 |
|
That irks my cookies too. It really honks me off | by NOLAWitch | 2004-05-11 14:04:56 |
|
Ah, the Right to Life movement. | by amanita | 2004-05-11 14:10:33 |
|
It's definitely related. | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 14:15:51 |
|
Not really. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 14:29:24 |
|
Consider | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 14:38:01 |
|
How do you condemn someone to life? | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 14:50:41 |
|
It's not quite as easy. | by chrisP | 2004-05-11 15:05:31 |
|
So set the bar high. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 15:12:54 |
|
That isn't what it says at all. | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 15:14:46 |
|
And that's not the way laws usually are made. | by chrisP | 2004-05-11 16:05:31 |
|
Not quite | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-12 06:29:04 |
|
i didnt see where | by gibuu | 2004-05-11 15:33:16 |
|
I can think of a few scenarios... | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 18:54:50 |
|
Nope. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 21:20:14 |
|
That does not compute. | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 14:31:12 |
|
Oh that's easy. | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 14:39:13 |
|
They already do that | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 14:50:46 |
|
I believe the problem | by rshepard | 2004-05-11 14:40:10 |
|
By that argument | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 14:43:46 |
|
In a sense, they do. | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-05-11 14:56:19 |
|
But there is a big difference. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 15:02:27 |
|
We should let him because | by rshepard | 2004-05-11 15:13:31 |
|
He is Already not supporting the children | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 15:18:22 |
|
What job does this guy have? | by Reddy | 2004-05-11 15:23:47 |
|
I should think that's obvious... | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 15:25:42 |
|
lol (nt) | by gibuu | 2004-05-11 15:35:41 |
|
Not naive--it's the law. | by rshepard | 2004-05-11 15:52:29 |
|
Nope. He's already been PROVEN guilty. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 18:28:07 |
|
He's already been proven guilty | by thewrongcrowd | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
But that is why he can't have MORE kids. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 21:17:36 |
|
BAD LOGIC! No cookie for you. | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 15:19:12 |
|
Not sure its bad logic.. | by rshepard | 2004-05-11 15:38:49 |
|
It's not a question of logic at all. | by chrisP | 2004-05-11 15:50:16 |
|
There is an offense though. | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-12 06:36:38 |
|
But privacy and self-determination | by BloodyViking | 2004-05-11 15:04:28 |
|
So what I'm hearing is... | by Spud31 | 2004-05-11 14:18:04 |
|
Check the results on the survey yet? | by Blackbyrd2 | 2004-05-11 14:14:47 |
|
If the state pays for the operation... | by Naruki | 2004-05-11 14:24:45 |
|
according to what I've heard, they don't. (n/t) | by leistico | 2004-05-11 15:38:38 |
