"They just leave those inconvenient hard to understand bits out, or edit them into something "more understandable"."
is not an explanation of my gripe. Otherwise, you may retract your inaccurate characterization of my statement as "pure" ad hominem. I acknowledge that "windbag" is perjorative, but if you believe that Sagan was completely accurate in his portrayal of science, there's a nice trailer down the road you might like.
(BTW, the last part of that last sentence was hyperbole, which I hope you already knew.) |
