The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Iraq Hostage Situation by Naruki2004-04-12 07:22:37
  It's a war isn't it? by McGowan2006-11-19 12:55:59
    Geneva Convention, article 3 (partial) by LionsPhil 2004-04-12 09:48:10
Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;
(b) Taking of hostages;
(c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment;
(d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.
(Highlighting mine.) They are at guilty of war crimes at a bare minimum (unless I'm misinterpreting this).
[ Reply ]
      Hmmm... and yet, to my understanding... by justwanderin2004-04-12 09:59:49
        Actually that's inaccurate by TheGM2004-04-12 10:08:42
          Well I'm pretty sure that that answers that... by justwanderin2004-04-12 10:10:51
            War was not declared by Kickstart2004-04-12 10:28:00
              Erm, didn't the US declare a war on drugs? by McGowan2004-04-12 10:37:41
                Nope, no formal declaration of war on drugs. by NOLAWitch2004-04-12 10:42:43
                  it wouldn't be a conspiracy if you could prove it. (n/t) by McGowan2004-04-12 10:48:48
                    Wouldn't be a conspiracy "theory". by NOLAWitch2004-04-12 10:50:36
                    Actually, it would. by Naruki2004-04-12 10:50:50
                      ok it wouldn't be a conspiracy for long. by McGowan2004-04-12 10:56:57
              Yeah I didn't think so... by justwanderin2006-11-19 12:55:59
        the geneva convention applies by dissociated2004-04-12 11:08:14
      Looks lovely on paper doesn't it? by McGowan2004-04-12 10:02:43
      i read 'detention' as by dissociated2004-04-12 11:04:05
        I don't think you're right about detention. by LionsPhil2004-04-12 11:07:20
          i think they have to be under detention before by dissociated2004-04-12 11:17:32
            I think you are mistaken. by Naruki2004-04-12 11:21:20
              see the following link by dissociated2006-11-19 12:55:59
                Technically it would. by Naruki2004-04-12 11:44:49
      Somehow, I think the Geneva Convention is lost by crash_2004-04-12 11:14:55
        It does mean, however, by LionsPhil2004-04-12 11:21:59
        this isn't palestine, sorry by dissociated2004-04-12 11:23:30

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)