|
Iraq Hostage Situation | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 07:22:37 |
| It's a war isn't it? |
by McGowan |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| Personally I don't think they are terrorists as they are defending their land from an invading army.
So the whole burning alive thing is obviously wrong but taking prisoners and threatening to kill them in a more humane way I think it's acceptable.
They have to fight the war differently to us because they are not government funded, they don't have years of training and they don't have "pin point accurate" bombs so they use what they can.
600 Iraqi's dead in these recent battles, many civillian.
70 coalition troops dead.
With those numbers you could easily say that the coalition are the terrorists.
Some of those could easily describe the coalition |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
It looked so much better with formatting. (n/t) | by McGowan | 2004-04-12 09:39:42 |
|
Personally I love the classic... | by justwanderin | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Geneva Convention, article 3 (partial) | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 09:48:10 |
|
Hmmm... and yet, to my understanding... | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 09:59:49 |
|
Actually that's inaccurate | by TheGM | 2004-04-12 10:08:42 |
|
Well I'm pretty sure that that answers that... | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 10:10:51 |
|
War was not declared | by Kickstart | 2004-04-12 10:28:00 |
|
Erm, didn't the US declare a war on drugs? | by McGowan | 2004-04-12 10:37:41 |
|
Nope, no formal declaration of war on drugs. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 10:42:43 |
|
it wouldn't be a conspiracy if you could prove it. (n/t) | by McGowan | 2004-04-12 10:48:48 |
|
Wouldn't be a conspiracy "theory". | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 10:50:36 |
|
Actually, it would. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 10:50:50 |
|
ok it wouldn't be a conspiracy for long. | by McGowan | 2004-04-12 10:56:57 |
|
Yeah I didn't think so... | by justwanderin | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
the geneva convention applies | by dissociated | 2004-04-12 11:08:14 |
|
Looks lovely on paper doesn't it? | by McGowan | 2004-04-12 10:02:43 |
|
i read 'detention' as | by dissociated | 2004-04-12 11:04:05 |
|
I don't think you're right about detention. | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 11:07:20 |
|
i think they have to be under detention before | by dissociated | 2004-04-12 11:17:32 |
|
I think you are mistaken. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 11:21:20 |
|
see the following link | by dissociated | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Technically it would. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 11:44:49 |
|
Somehow, I think the Geneva Convention is lost | by crash_ | 2004-04-12 11:14:55 |
|
It does mean, however, | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 11:21:59 |
|
this isn't palestine, sorry | by dissociated | 2004-04-12 11:23:30 |
