|
Iraq Hostage Situation | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 07:22:37 |
|
unfortunately... It works. | by jeff_uk | 2004-04-12 07:36:41 |
|
No. That is just testamant to | by BloodyViking | 2004-04-12 07:41:10 |
|
Why are they foolish? | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 07:43:28 |
|
Why now? | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 07:47:11 |
|
Wait a minute | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 07:53:54 |
|
It's a bit early to say it didn't work | by Control | 2004-04-12 08:03:25 |
|
It didn't | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 08:13:16 |
|
...'who know how to react'... ? | by Control | 2004-04-12 08:27:37 |
| One correct response and I don't know how the heck |
by justwanderin |
2004-04-12 08:30:10 |
| it can be done. I also don't think that it is possible for the war cabinet in office to achieve it. Bring world opinion over to the side of the U.S.. Especially in those countries from which the terrorists are finding their funding/supplies/troops. It would bring an organization down to the level of the unibomber and they could all be picked off one by one. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Problem is | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 08:41:33 |
|
How? | by JPaganel | 2004-04-12 08:48:38 |
|
So you think we can buy off | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 08:57:56 |
|
No, no, | by JPaganel | 2004-04-12 09:06:27 |
|
HOW?!?!?!? | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:16:52 |
|
32 cents at a time | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 09:22:46 |
|
"ALL FANATICS MUST DIE!!!!!", eh, DR? (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 09:28:57 |
|
If they present a clear and present threat. YES!!! | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 09:31:48 |
|
You are obviously a fanatic. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 09:36:47 |
|
Yes. if they do present a clear and present | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 09:36:49 |
|
The threat in Iraq was perceived | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 09:47:24 |
|
Just as the threat FROM Iraq was perceived | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 10:23:00 |
|
One? ONE?!?!?! | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 11:13:00 |
|
You mean the neo-cons, and Bush's game. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 11:14:14 |
|
OK, several wrong assumptions by Dumbya | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 11:20:14 |
|
It wasn't like anyone was saying that | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 11:35:48 |
|
The protest against shrub isn't the allegations | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 11:43:17 |
|
You're arguing with a blind zealot. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 12:00:08 |
|
I honestly can't tell whether you are being | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:28:55 |
|
You mean casting "aspersions" and Shrub has no | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 12:35:52 |
|
So I'm an oxymoron. :) | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:40:31 |
|
You should see me discuss things with reasonable | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 12:48:46 |
|
I'd argue with you right now except that you | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:49:44 |
|
Nah, Looney Tunes is more like it. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 12:50:43 |
|
Being honestly bitter. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 12:42:45 |
|
So kill the stinky puppy for making messes | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:48:20 |
|
sigh... a question mark was supposed to be | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:48:58 |
|
Heh. If only. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 12:49:37 |
|
Oh, and Hans Blix was chopped liver. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 12:06:01 |
|
Four months | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 12:43:44 |
|
Uh... how again did that indicate an immedi | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:51:06 |
|
sigh... immediate threat I meant... | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:52:08 |
|
Did they find anything? NO! You wait until you | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 12:56:54 |
|
Your weakness is giving him too many | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 13:02:40 |
|
There you go with the party line again | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
"program activities" | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 14:01:44 |
|
No I don't | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 14:06:47 |
|
See? | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 14:10:40 |
|
So where does.. | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 14:05:21 |
|
Those aren't suppositions by Bush | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 14:12:24 |
|
Delegation of Authority | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 14:27:32 |
|
But you can delegate responsibility | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Well, there are people that do that for a living. | by JPaganel | 2004-04-12 10:02:08 |
|
The German Masses were convinced | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 10:05:01 |
|
Come on now | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 11:13:13 |
|
Marketing a massive cultural shift? | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 12:57:14 |
|
The neocons have been doing it too. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 13:17:57 |
|
There is supposed to be a quick counter to that | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 13:23:09 |
|
If they ditched slavery, they can bring it back. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 13:29:41 |
|
Is it... | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 13:29:41 |
|
Ah, my mistake, then. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 13:36:26 |
|
Was that not internal? | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 13:27:46 |
|
You are suggesting that there is no funding? (n/t) | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 13:30:39 |
|
Ha, if there was a company such as Halliburton | by NOLAWitch | 2004-04-12 13:32:46 |
|
Well, that gets back to funding | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 13:58:50 |
|
Radical suggestion | by Control | 2004-04-12 08:49:50 |
|
Didn't the U.N. try to grant amnesty to US troops | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 08:53:56 |
|
Oh please! | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 09:01:41 |
|
Hmmm... could it be because the countries with | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 09:07:03 |
|
The UN | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:02:13 |
|
I agree it not perfect, but it's the best availabl | by Control | 2004-04-12 09:06:19 |
|
They said that about the League of Nations too (n/ (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2004-04-12 09:13:00 |
|
Disagree | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:23:55 |
|
Disagree with your disagreement... | by justwanderin | 2004-04-12 09:29:58 |
|
Your point? | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:46:27 |
|
Sorry for the dreadful typing there | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:47:02 |
|
Blair likes Bush, | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 09:49:42 |
|
So? | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:53:46 |
|
Indeed. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 09:55:07 |
|
Is there a better evil right now? | by vetitice | 2004-04-12 10:03:07 |
|
There's always Lib Dem. ;) (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 10:07:03 |
|
That's what I was planning.... | by vetitice | 2004-04-12 10:30:20 |
|
I don't think the US is quite that bad yet. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 09:35:20 |
|
Optimist. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2004-04-12 09:37:15 |
|
Doubtful | by hyzenthlay | 2004-04-12 09:48:55 |
|
Not likely, given the current choices. (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2004-04-12 11:47:51 |
|
So you don't think Kerry can win. | by Naruki | 2004-04-12 11:57:24 |
|
Actually, I am more in doubt | by BloodyViking | 2004-04-12 12:30:39 |
|
The National Ballot can take cue from the | by justwanderin | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |