|
Illiad +anyone else.... | by tesla_koil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
A link to the actual Constitution: | by NOLAWitch | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
It would be interesting to hear your counter- | by adiplomat | 2004-03-17 10:08:52 |
|
I've already given it in posts past, however, I'll | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 10:13:14 |
|
Well, that's not really what I was asking for. | by Adiplomat | 2004-03-17 11:31:57 |
|
That is my assertion. They PURPOSEFULLY | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 11:44:46 |
|
Sorry. I did my (obviously inadequate) best | by Adiplomat | 2004-03-17 12:58:51 |
|
I don't understand your question either. | by quilting_kitty | 2004-03-17 13:04:43 |
|
Never mind that. Let HIM answer for a change. (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 13:15:03 |
| While you won't use the words, the smell of |
by Adiplomat |
2004-03-17 13:33:18 |
roasting is in your every post.
Can you not see that from moment I posted, it was a sub-thread? I'm posting regarding your seeming assertion that Christianity had no effect on the founding of the United States. As I said in reply to BloodyViking, my concern is historical revisionism. As far as MY topic goes, "should" or "shouldn't" are not concerned. "Did" or "didn't" are where I'm going.
Quilting_Kitty, I'll do my best. My question is:
"Given the recorded religious affiliations of the signers of the Declaration of Independence, and the framers of the Constitution, what counter-evidence exists that their religious affiliations had no effect on the writing of these documents?"
My assertion is that, whether or not they should have been, historical evidence states that the Founders (when all, not just a chosen few, are considered) religious beliefs were part of the process of the Founding. Furthermore, those same people were largely Christian (one sect or another), so that Christianity did affect the founding.
I'll state again (why I don't know, no one appears to be listening) that I am concerned with possible distortion of history, NOT any application to current events. Drag that in once more and this conversation dies right here. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
The counter-evidence is clear: they didn't cram | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 13:41:14 |
|
You were warned. I'm done. (n/t) | by Adiplomat | 2004-03-17 13:50:00 |
|
Well, you did offer your genitals up for roasting. (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 13:51:00 |
|
Oh, and I believe I stuck to the points in your | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 13:54:03 |
|
Ahem. | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 14:05:51 |
|
Cabbage of course. It's cooking right now. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-03-17 15:01:07 |
|
For good, or just this thread? | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 13:54:51 |
|
If you don't like Historical Revisionism... | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 13:41:55 |
|
My only comment here is that you seem to think | by quilting_kitty | 2004-03-17 13:45:40 |
