| Rumsfeld caught in a lie about what he said |
by dire_lobo |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
yep, it's from "MoveOn" - but it's a feed from this past weeks "Face The Nation" - not for the squemish on the right... It flys in the face of delusional denial... Those with a open mind may want to take a look here.
granted, they have an agenda, but facts are facts. (requires flash)
that is all. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I'm sure it would be a lot more effective | by LionsPhil | 2004-03-17 12:28:27 |
|
What you need is a REALLY robust OS like XP! | by dire_lobo | 2004-03-17 13:35:08 |
|
Correct. | by LionsPhil | 2004-03-17 13:42:07 |
|
You should stick with Windows, then... | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 13:45:07 |
|
I suspect the problem lies with Flash Player... | by Elessar | 2004-03-17 13:45:20 |
|
Oh wow two words | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You're incorrigible. | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-03-17 12:48:41 |
|
Then how about Kerry's claim in 1998 | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 12:53:15 |
|
Got a source? | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-03-17 12:58:47 |
|
Public Record | by DesertRat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
that was a rational statement | by swisscheese | 2004-03-17 14:01:40 |
|
So let me get this straight | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:18:43 |
|
Well, you figured out one thing at least. | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 14:21:52 |
|
Did you really read your linkies? | by thewrongcrowd | 2004-03-17 14:42:39 |
|
You mean back when | by BloodyViking | 2004-03-17 13:59:56 |
|
Simple | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:04:38 |
|
Rumsfeld had other info to go from. | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 14:11:48 |
|
O.K. | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:30:53 |
|
No, what MoveOn was showing was that Rumsfield was | by buddha | 2004-03-17 14:12:38 |
|
Remind me to ask you about something you said | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:27:14 |
|
Apples and oranges. | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 14:33:42 |
|
Considering the amount that was said | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:37:10 |
|
what he said was | by gibuu | 2004-03-17 14:52:57 |
|
There is a difference between saying | by buddha | 2004-03-17 15:01:43 |
|
he can remember (couldn't do his job otherwise) | by swisscheese | 2004-03-17 15:12:29 |
|
I dunno, If I say somthing that's plausably going | by dire_lobo | 2004-03-17 15:13:23 |
|
as if Rumsfeld didn't know better | by swisscheese | 2004-03-17 14:13:12 |
|
That's not the case - | by dire_lobo | 2004-03-17 14:43:05 |
|
Um, he who? | by BloodyViking | 2004-03-17 14:56:54 |
|
My question is, | by JPaganel | 2004-03-17 13:03:43 |
|
uhm... what are the two words? ;-) | by dire_lobo | 2004-03-17 13:24:32 |
|
Some problems | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 13:51:31 |
|
Not true! | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 14:17:59 |
|
You have taken one too many pazers to the head :) | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:25:11 |
|
I don't know his reasons. | by Naruki | 2004-03-17 14:28:14 |
|
There you go again | by DesertRat66 | 2004-03-17 14:34:38 |
|
And this is pertinent to Rumsfield lying how? (nt) | by buddha | 2004-03-17 13:59:50 |
|
DR, for all his good attributes... | by Kickstart | 2004-03-17 15:15:26 |
|
I like the "charging pig" thing (n/t) | by buddha | 2004-03-17 15:26:48 |
|
Go DesertRat! | by Gorgar | 2004-03-17 14:42:43 |
