The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Illiad +anyone else.... by tesla_koil 2006-11-19 12:55:59
as per yesterdays conversation.... here is a link to some of the reasons why I say the constitution is built upon christian principles of free choice and indvidual moral responsibility... will be installing a coldfusion/flash project onsite most of the day i await comments with bated breath. good day to all.
[ Reply ]
  Your link is borked. Redo it. (n/t) by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 08:28:30
  Sheesh.. I even read it ouloud before i posted it. by tesla_koil2006-11-19 12:55:59
    Swell. You've got a bunch of quotes. by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 08:40:17
    OK, for starters... by Illiad2004-03-17 08:44:14
      He can't do that by DarthSane2006-11-19 12:55:59
        More to come.... but for now by tesla_koil2004-03-17 08:58:43
          I notice... by JillSwift2004-03-17 09:15:33
            And most are by the same author by Spiff2006-11-19 12:55:59
      My Sentiments exactly! (n/t) by nelzie2004-03-17 08:53:38
      In short, when we look to the past in order to by dire_lobo2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Just because... by nelzie2004-03-17 08:52:10
  While the founding fathers were all Christian, by retiqlum22004-03-17 08:57:27
    No they weren't! by nelzie2006-11-19 12:55:59
      I was under the impression... by retiqlum22004-03-17 09:18:50
        Depends on how loosely you define "Christian" by tigermouse2004-03-17 09:23:44
          And both of those terms have by Slacktime2004-03-17 09:28:11
            16th century? by Nea2004-03-17 09:29:21
              Yes, it was. (n/t) by retiqlum22004-03-17 09:31:10
              hmmm I might have done my off by one by Slacktime2004-03-17 09:32:25
            Still, I have yet to see one citation of a by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 09:37:57
              I didn't say it by Slacktime2004-03-17 09:45:22
                Sigh... sorry for the messed up sentence by Slacktime2004-03-17 09:47:45
                I think that a true atheist.. by abstrackt2004-03-17 09:48:16
                  Why wouldn't they care? by Naruki2004-03-17 10:48:24
                    I never said caring made someone by abstrackt2004-03-17 11:01:15
                      Apethetics-->Apathetics (oops) (n/t) by abstrackt2004-03-17 11:09:49
                      There's a reason you've never heard it before. by Naruki2004-03-17 11:14:18
                        Making up words again? ;) (n/t) by abstrackt2004-03-17 11:14:56
                          Of course not! by Naruki2004-03-17 11:18:20
                  Atheists still don't like lying. (n/t) by TheGM2004-03-17 11:37:09
                So what if they become ambiguous to me? by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 10:03:32
                  The whole 'God' stuff on money... by nelzie2004-03-17 10:18:58
                    Stupidity is timeless, eh? by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 10:21:05
                    Ouch. by Naruki2004-03-17 10:57:25
                      I was under the impression... by nelzie2004-03-17 11:01:47
                        It was the combination of your post by Naruki2004-03-17 11:13:10
            Well, it depends on how much detail is needed by tigermouse2004-03-17 09:47:29
              That''s ok by Slacktime2004-03-17 09:49:17
                Not sure if they have that as a cause by tigermouse2004-03-17 10:00:01
                That's not nice! by retiqlum22004-03-17 10:42:21
                  If you take 'Christian' out of your second-to-last by romandas2004-03-18 08:05:06
        Christians... by nelzie2004-03-17 10:04:47
  A link to the actual Constitution: by NOLAWitch2006-11-19 12:55:59
    It would be interesting to hear your counter- by adiplomat2004-03-17 10:08:52
      The sentence... by nelzie2004-03-17 10:13:12
        Given when Scientology was founded, by adiplomat2004-03-17 10:26:42
          She's already given it to you. by Naruki2004-03-17 10:43:11
          You are right... by nelzie2004-03-17 11:05:23
      I've already given it in posts past, however, I'll by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 10:13:14
        Well, that's not really what I was asking for. by Adiplomat2004-03-17 11:31:57
          That is my assertion. They PURPOSEFULLY by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 11:44:46
            Sorry. I did my (obviously inadequate) best by Adiplomat2004-03-17 12:58:51
              I don't understand your question either. by quilting_kitty2004-03-17 13:04:43
                Never mind that. Let HIM answer for a change. (n/t) by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 13:15:03
                  While you won't use the words, the smell of by Adiplomat2004-03-17 13:33:18
                    The counter-evidence is clear: they didn't cram by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 13:41:14
                      You were warned. I'm done. (n/t) by Adiplomat2004-03-17 13:50:00
                        Well, you did offer your genitals up for roasting. (n/t) by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 13:51:00
                          Oh, and I believe I stuck to the points in your by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 13:54:03
                            Ahem. by Naruki2004-03-17 14:05:51
                              Cabbage of course. It's cooking right now. by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 15:01:07
                        For good, or just this thread? by Naruki2004-03-17 13:54:51
                    If you don't like Historical Revisionism... by Naruki2004-03-17 13:41:55
                    My only comment here is that you seem to think by quilting_kitty2004-03-17 13:45:40
              YOU are the one who should be answering by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 13:14:10
          That is an unfounded assertion. by BloodyViking2004-03-17 12:09:39
            If you insist on referring ONLY to the documents by Adiplomat2004-03-17 13:14:35
              BZZZT! You're off the track again. by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 13:17:25
              Got proof? Didn't think so. by Naruki2004-03-17 13:23:43
              Many perhaps but not most. by BloodyViking2004-03-17 13:32:24
      just a question by gibuu2004-03-17 10:35:23
        That's a good thought, actually. by abstrackt2004-03-17 11:03:22
  OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF MY HEART by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 10:39:31
    Ye've got a great heart, guvnor. by Naruki2004-03-17 10:59:59
      There's more substance in my bra than in their by NOLAWitch2004-03-17 11:09:39
        Wait...Are you saying that Naruki=your bra? by quilting_kitty2004-03-17 11:15:32
          Whoa! by Naruki2004-03-17 11:19:58
            hehe but can you bear the burden by gibuu2004-03-17 11:23:42
              I'm not sure about that... by Naruki2004-03-17 11:24:39
            *bookmarks link* RICL (n/t) by quilting_kitty2004-03-17 11:36:36
        Not a fair comparison by Slacktime2004-03-17 11:18:23
  those quotes could support either side by swisscheese2004-03-17 11:14:56
  Do christians own the principles? by emtieswall2004-03-17 14:29:22
  Related... Religious Courts with Secular Courts by LthrOTtr2006-11-19 12:55:59

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)