The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Rejecting the fatal path of appeasement by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
  Dilemma by Control 2004-03-17 08:03:12
I agree that after such an attack, giving in and doing what the culprits want is not a good idea. It sends a message along the lines of 'Your method works. Repeat at will.'. However, what should one do, if what the attackers want is actually what you should have done long ago.

In the madrid case: Pulling out of the 'coalition of aggressors' is something spain should have done long ago. So is switching to the socialist government. However, doing it now sends a bad signal to whoever planted those bombs.

So I ask you, what should they have done? Should they stay with a government that violates the peoples trust, by sending spanish soldiers into a war that 90% of the population were against, just because the bombers want it different?
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)