UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

"Exhibit closed over nude photograhs of child"	by Khaar	2006-11-19 12:55:59
It's stupid.	by BrainBug	2004-03-09 11:36:42
Don't get me wrong. It's a good thing that people are sensitive about this topic. But, like the artist, I really can't see how someone could interpret any kind of sexual intent into them (though I haven't actually seen the pictures, so just assuming about their content). Especially the baby/toddler pictures strike me as completely harmless and nothing unusual in most parts of Europe. I don't know anybody who doesn't have those kinds of pictures at home in the family album. And I don't think that the pictures' content changes in any way just because it's a gallery and not your private home... Granted, some paedophiliac might take it as a sexual depiction of his desires, but I don't think that invalidates the picture or its exhibition. It just shows that this person is a rather sick bastard...
[ Reply ]
Yeah. It's kinda like saying	by subbywan	2004-03-09 11:42:35

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)