Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no... | by Khaar | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| So now they force all firewalls |
by scissors |
2004-02-10 05:38:41 |
to block *.com and *.net, unless it's an "already approved named site". This way NO typo's go out any more behind the FW, and NO previously un-visited sites can be reached.
While it WILL be costly, and ask more IT security staff, it will also make (other) spam more difficult. Of course, spam-sites aren't "always" in the com or net TLD's, but many are.
IF they go through with it, i guess it can force companies to GIVE UP THEIR net / com names, changing for something reachable. As customers, they 'd QUIT verisign, and more: sue for forcing them to another round of advertising.
Thinking of that: will that be SPAM-type advertising? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Run your own root zone servers | by Slamlander | 2004-02-10 05:42:38 |
|
No, that's what Verisign is PAID FOR | by scissors | 2004-02-10 05:58:59 |
|
That is definitely not true | by Slamlander | 2004-02-10 06:02:46 |
|
