UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Consider the Death Penalty...	by DesertRat66	2006-11-19 12:55:59
If he was telling the truth...	by Naruki	2004-01-15 09:51:03
Oh?	by DesertRat66	2004-01-15 10:12:57
Don't ask me.	by Naruki	2004-01-15 10:33:46
I only read the article you linked. In the introductory paragraph, they said his claims of mental retardation were rejected. I take that to mean he wasn't denying having pulled the trigger, just about being responsible for the murder. It should go without saying that I wouldn't convict the man in question based on my interpretation of an article's blurb. I was just answering your question in the context you raised it in (here's the story, what if he is telling the truth). I agree that the proof of the crime needs to be as stringently defined and scrupulously adhered to as you suggest - I just don't agree with anyone that mentally retarded people are less punishable for capital offenses than mentally competent people.
[ Reply ]
I think the claims of retardation	by DesertRat66	2004-01-15 10:49:56
You didn't read the entire article.	by ag_wyvern	2004-01-15 11:57:31
That statement indicates no such thing.	by BloodyViking	2004-01-15 12:56:44
Did a google search...	by ag_wyvern	2004-01-15 13:36:55
Well That indicates that there	by BloodyViking	2004-01-15 13:44:21
True enough... I took a leap...	by ag_wyvern	2004-01-15 14:27:16
It looks like there was reasonable doubt	by Slamlander	2004-01-15 15:34:35
You can't make that determination from the news.	by BloodyViking	2004-01-16 06:43:32

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)