| Consider the Death Penalty... |
by DesertRat66 |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
especially if you are for it. Read this story and think about it. What if he was telling the truth?
It leaves me more convinced than ever that the bar for the death penalty needs to be set VERY high. So high in fact, that executions are rare. IMO things like eyewitnesses AND DNA evidence should be necessary to pass that sentence. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
only two crimes diserve death | by defect | 2004-01-15 07:43:08 |
|
and spawn camping (n/t) | by demonhedge | 2004-01-15 07:59:25 |
|
And team kills, and... | by LionsPhil | 2004-01-15 08:17:12 |
|
hey! It was seawall battery! | by Ubergeek2 | 2004-01-15 08:24:07 |
|
I was trying to take it. | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 09:47:53 |
|
I agree... | by Monitr7 | 2004-01-15 07:56:21 |
|
Correction | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 08:00:15 |
|
I stand corrected. Thanks, Rat. (n/t) | by Monitr7 | 2004-01-15 08:30:31 |
|
Don't mention it | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 10:06:02 |
|
I used to be in favor of Capital Punishment | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 08:01:12 |
|
Someone mentioned a couple days ago | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 08:13:58 |
|
The blocking of DNA testing | by tigermouse | 2004-01-15 08:20:12 |
|
Yes, I read that and was appalled! | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 09:03:57 |
|
Which victimless crimes? | by LionsPhil | 2004-01-15 08:23:20 |
|
Drug use | by DarthSane | 2004-01-15 08:24:46 |
|
Ok, yup, that's one of them. | by LionsPhil | 2004-01-15 08:26:45 |
|
and then there is prostitution | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 08:53:48 |
|
Indeed. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2004-01-15 08:56:17 |
|
There's also the definition of "victim" | by JohnClarke | 2004-01-15 09:17:07 |
|
Prisons in America have become a new | by webishop | 2004-01-15 08:31:53 |
|
What DNA evidence would there be in a shooting? | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 08:12:57 |
|
"multiple reliable witnesses"... | by delcted | 2004-01-15 08:43:08 |
|
That's why _multiple_ | by JohnClarke | 2004-01-15 09:11:35 |
|
Is 20 enough? | by delcted | 2004-01-15 09:43:57 |
|
continuation | by delcted | 2004-01-15 09:52:32 |
|
I'd want more details | by JohnClarke | 2004-01-15 10:07:41 |
|
Some of the details | by delcted | 2004-01-15 10:36:18 |
|
Agree agree and agree | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 10:05:28 |
|
But do consider also just how unreliable | by webishop | 2004-01-15 08:33:55 |
|
You stole the word right out of my mouth. | by skeptic | 2004-01-15 09:14:18 |
|
Sadly... | by Illiad | 2004-01-15 09:30:53 |
|
Which is precisely why | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 10:01:10 |
|
NOTHING "deserves" death. If you are for it as a | by adiplomat | 2004-01-15 09:00:24 |
|
Boy! work really messes up proofreading! | by adiplomat | 2004-01-15 09:08:27 |
|
I don't quite get you here ... | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 09:12:39 |
|
If you are a murderer judged incapable of reform, | by adiplomat | 2004-01-15 09:29:40 |
|
It's right to kill a dog just because of hunger... (n/t) | by delcted | 2004-01-15 09:33:59 |
|
Depending on the circumstances, yes! (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 09:48:30 |
|
I can't think of any circumstances when it would | by delcted | 2004-01-15 09:57:18 |
|
I can think of one and it's extreme | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 10:10:19 |
|
Yeah, my sailor says we'll eat the neighbors, | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 10:12:54 |
|
I have no problem with that but, | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 10:19:01 |
|
Dude, "Not Guilty" != "Innocent" | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 12:18:46 |
|
In the USA it does! | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 12:47:26 |
|
That'd be nice. | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 12:49:58 |
|
The old one is just fine | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 12:50:43 |
|
No, we need a new one | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 12:53:44 |
|
Do you really know | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 12:56:02 |
|
Yep (n/t) | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 13:00:13 |
|
Presumed != Proved | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 12:51:27 |
|
"Treated as if" innocent? | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 12:54:07 |
|
Where did I say "treated as if" anything? | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 13:15:33 |
|
Defined: "Innocent" | by corsicagt | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
What's your point? | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 14:19:49 |
|
Let me back up and do this right | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 13:09:44 |
|
Correction: | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 13:20:07 |
|
Your last para was correct | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 13:32:59 |
|
It seems more ludicrous to me | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 13:52:07 |
|
Yes, and why is that? | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 15:03:40 |
|
And just how did he manage that? | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 15:29:51 |
|
at the risk of revealing my ignorance :) | by gibuu | 2004-01-15 15:35:45 |
|
hehe | by gibuu | 2004-01-15 15:40:59 |
|
The test is "reasonable doubt" | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 15:42:27 |
|
Yeah and we all saw Cochran get plenty of that | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 15:48:23 |
|
All of that is irrelevant to the point. | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 13:41:14 |
|
and the civil case should not be allowed | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 12:49:51 |
|
Why not? | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 13:07:31 |
|
Try perjury, for one. | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 13:12:29 |
|
O.K. calm down | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 09:52:52 |
|
Depends on how you define "deserve", I think. | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 09:59:03 |
|
Self defence for society | by JPaganel | 2004-01-15 10:35:48 |
|
Consider the quality of life in most prison | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 09:09:37 |
|
Maybe the correct punishment would be | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 09:25:57 |
|
Geeky response! Silly Slacktime, you KNOW | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 09:27:30 |
|
Oh.... really??? | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 09:31:54 |
|
I heard about it on NPR this morning | by NedLudd | 2004-01-15 09:47:36 |
|
If he was telling the truth... | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 09:51:03 |
|
Oh? | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 10:12:57 |
|
Don't ask me. | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 10:33:46 |
|
I think the claims of retardation | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 10:49:56 |
|
You didn't read the entire article. | by ag_wyvern | 2004-01-15 11:57:31 |
|
That statement indicates no such thing. | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 12:56:44 |
|
Did a google search... | by ag_wyvern | 2004-01-15 13:36:55 |
|
Well That indicates that there | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-15 13:44:21 |
|
True enough... I took a leap... | by ag_wyvern | 2004-01-15 14:27:16 |
|
It looks like there was reasonable doubt | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 15:34:35 |
|
You can't make that determination from the news. | by BloodyViking | 2004-01-16 06:43:32 |
|
As Gandalf put it rather nicely: | by huitzilopochtli | 2004-01-15 10:44:05 |
|
so what do you do with the people | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 10:45:44 |
|
How about life imprisonment with no parole? (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 10:49:49 |
|
That's just punishing the families of the victims | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 10:53:21 |
|
Hey, the criminals' families pay taxes too. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 10:59:50 |
|
That only works until the next election. (n/t) | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 11:01:06 |
|
Yet another way that the system is broken. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2004-01-15 14:16:52 |
|
By your definition the death penalty is a worse .. | by cristobal | 2004-01-15 11:24:39 |
|
I've argued that as well. | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 11:30:22 |
|
But that sets a very dangerous precedent | by cristobal | 2004-01-15 11:56:22 |
|
Or the development of DNA testing tech | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 11:59:40 |
|
Perhaps | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 12:01:22 |
|
You can't enforce that, no way | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 10:54:19 |
|
It's ever so costly. | by nin_man | 2004-01-15 10:59:07 |
|
Why aren't those bastidges performing some | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 11:02:09 |
|
Because you can't force a prisoner to do work | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 11:06:01 |
|
Make prison food vegan | by tigermouse | 2004-01-15 11:11:03 |
|
wanna bet how many sue for "cruel and | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 11:13:26 |
|
Heck, they might sue no matter what | by tigermouse | 2004-01-15 11:16:37 |
|
But you can't *force* them to work | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 11:19:49 |
|
Then let them eat gruel as you suggested. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 11:23:44 |
|
You're preaching to the choir here... | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 11:26:20 |
|
It's called 'slavery'! | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 11:16:28 |
|
Though I was being facetious, | by tigermouse | 2004-01-15 11:26:08 |
|
You'd have a lot more murder if I were in prison. | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 11:57:47 |
|
And thus ends our prison overpopulation issue | by subbywan | 2004-01-15 12:02:06 |
|
Many prisons do that. | by nin_man | 2004-01-15 11:27:50 |
|
You detach them from society. | by huitzilopochtli | 2004-01-15 10:57:53 |
|
Ahhh Conventry ... | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 10:59:00 |
|
My roommate in college... | by Ravenlock | 2004-01-15 11:26:48 |
|
*snicker* | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 13:06:17 |
|
I believe the Sixth Commandment properly | by DesertRat66 | 2004-01-15 11:05:45 |
|
I think you're right.. | by PathOGene | 2004-01-15 11:32:04 |
|
The problem is in the proof. | by Slamlander | 2004-01-15 12:07:41 |
|
and the proof is in the pudding. | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 12:12:27 |
|
Jello Instant pudding, of course. (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 12:29:06 |
|
Butterscotch, pls. 8-) (n/t) | by PathOGene | 2004-01-15 12:46:39 |
|
New Jello Brand Instant Justice Pudding! | by Naruki | 2004-01-15 13:07:15 |
|
the proof of the pudding is in the tasting (nt) | by gibuu | 2004-01-15 15:57:59 |
|
aye | by friareriner | 2004-01-15 21:14:19 |
|
No no no. The line on the money means | by tnglives | 2004-01-15 11:11:53 |
|
According to this guy | by Slacktime | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
The best part is that new age and false religion | by delcted | 2004-01-15 11:41:17 |
|
hehe.. "Rebelious (sic) Women" | by BlurOfSerenity | 2004-01-15 11:42:42 |
|
What yer rebellious? | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 11:45:43 |
|
What dipwad losers he and his ilk are. (n/t) | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 11:46:49 |
|
Would you toadify him for me?? | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 11:48:47 |
|
Yeah, toad would be an improvement for him. | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 11:55:10 |
|
Sounds like you met | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 12:07:17 |
|
It seems that many of the so-called Christians | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-15 18:04:48 |
|
Always a capitalist somewhere, too. | by tnglives | 2004-01-15 12:14:46 |
|
If I remember correctly | by Slacktime | 2004-01-15 12:17:44 |