The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
The purpose of arguing by subbywan2004-01-13 11:49:09
  If you ever admitted error in your basic premises, by adiplomat 2004-01-13 11:55:20
I would be more likely to buy this. I haven't EVER seen you say "You have convinced me, I was flat-out wrong.". You always wriggle until we tire of it and give up.

For a long time I, and many others, simply ignored your arguments because of this trait. It may be time again.
[ Reply ]
    which is fair enough. by subbywan2004-01-13 12:07:50
      Which support MY argument: by LurkerMo2004-01-13 12:13:54
      Then you are a leech. by Naruki2004-01-13 12:30:20
        Perhaps by subbywan2004-01-13 12:34:26
          That makes me think of Capt. X's question by Naruki2004-01-13 12:58:13
            Which is fair enough (n/t) by subbywan2004-01-13 13:02:35
      Arguing is just bickering. What I would suggest by webishop2004-01-13 12:47:09
        I would suggest that you check a dictionary. by BloodyViking2004-01-13 12:53:21
          Not with subby (n/t) by webishop2004-01-13 14:55:38
            Anything is possible with me :) (n/t) by subbywan2004-01-13 15:05:13
              Even a quadruple backflip off a sidewalk by Naruki2004-01-13 15:15:13
                Possible, but *highly* improbable :) (n/t) by subbywan2004-01-13 15:19:36
        But again, by subbywan2004-01-13 13:01:04
          You just never know where insight and that by NOLAWitch2004-01-13 13:14:17
            Hmmm .. point .. by subbywan2004-01-13 13:17:08
            As have I, in at least one issue we have in common by adiplomat2004-01-13 13:35:32
              I haven't. by Naruki2004-01-13 13:38:37
                I haven't either. by BloodyViking2004-01-13 13:45:32
                lol (nt) by gibuu2004-01-13 13:46:30
                Haven't you BEEN a newt already? (n/t) by adiplomat2004-01-13 13:51:32
              I feel the same way about some of you Christians. by NOLAWitch2004-01-13 13:45:08
                THAT, my dear NOLA, was the "issue in common" by adiplomat2004-01-13 13:49:40
      "No-one ever wins an arguement" by swisscheese2004-01-13 13:17:54
        You will never win one with That attitude. by BloodyViking2004-01-13 13:24:04
          I don't want to win -- I want to persuade ... by swisscheese2004-01-13 13:38:26
            Isn't that the same thing? by BloodyViking2004-01-13 13:52:15
              I argue to win. by Naruki2004-01-13 13:56:35
        I would go further and say by PathOGene2004-01-13 13:37:01
          I'd say .. "sentient" (n/t) by swisscheese2004-01-13 13:40:52
          Perhaps, but only if by BloodyViking2004-01-13 13:41:25
            The discussion, by PathOGene2004-01-13 13:54:02
        If you are arguing to win by gibuu2004-01-13 13:49:02
          GB Shaw quote: apples vs ideas by swisscheese2004-01-13 13:56:31
          Even if it is agreeing by PathOGene2004-01-13 13:57:44
            I usually LART people who do that. by Naruki2004-01-13 14:23:04
              why? (nt) by gibuu2004-01-13 14:24:46
                I would assume it's obvious. by Naruki2004-01-13 14:26:58
                  Oh, bull by tigermouse2004-01-13 14:57:58
                A slightly more helpful response: by BloodyViking2004-01-13 14:33:11
                  You assume that gibuu's monosyllabic by Naruki2004-01-13 14:39:16
                    Well, my response was slightly more helpful by BloodyViking2004-01-13 14:46:06
                      Yes... by Naruki2004-01-13 14:53:00
                        It is the same question. by BloodyViking2004-01-13 15:19:44
                          Nope. by Naruki2004-01-13 15:25:03
                            I didn't. by BloodyViking2004-01-13 15:32:03
                    Why by gibuu2004-01-13 14:50:44
                      insert "or" between by gibuu2004-01-13 14:52:00
                      LART by BloodyViking2006-11-19 12:55:59
                        thanks :) by gibuu2004-01-13 15:00:46
                      It doesn't mean laugh. by Naruki2004-01-13 15:03:37
                        thanks again by gibuu2004-01-13 15:11:39
                          I can do that before arguing, though. by Naruki2004-01-13 15:23:06
                            ok by gibuu2004-01-13 15:52:53
                              I'm pretty sure that's not what it means. by Naruki2004-01-13 17:09:45
                                **yawns at Naruki** **agrees to disagree by adiplomat2004-01-13 20:13:36
              To which you are entitled. (n/t) by PathOGene2004-01-13 14:32:02
                Really? by Naruki2004-01-13 14:33:23
                  Isn't it obvious? by BloodyViking2004-01-13 14:35:00
                  The Constitution! :) (n/t) by subbywan2004-01-13 14:37:24
                    Old Ironsides? by Naruki2004-01-13 14:39:47
                      it's got (or had) the biggest gun, you nit! ;P (n/t) by subbywan2004-01-13 14:41:55
                        It's not the size that matters... by Naruki2004-01-13 14:51:00
                          Damn manual targetting! (n/t) by subbywan2004-01-13 14:51:31
              Sometimes one set of facts will support more than by swisscheese2004-01-13 15:00:02
                Um... so? by Naruki2004-01-13 15:05:25
          There is that absolute by BloodyViking2004-01-13 13:59:10

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)