|
jimmy carter urges compassion for Mordor | by tegan | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Actually I kinda agree with him. | by Winsmith | 2004-01-13 09:22:57 |
| Oh please... |
by subbywan |
2004-01-13 09:25:39 |
While I'm not a fan of "lets go to war off the bat", I firmly believe there are some people/situations that can ONLY be resolved violently/militarily.
You can only negotiate with someone who *wants* to negotiate.
People hate to admit it, but force/violence is the authority from which all other authority flows. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
LOL! | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 09:28:17 |
|
Prove it | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:30:30 |
|
Ever heard of Gandhi? He did not have an army. (n/t) | by LurkerMo | 2004-01-13 09:33:30 |
|
And where is India today? | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:36:11 |
|
?? its a different war | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 09:56:50 |
|
Which is exactly my point. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:58:59 |
|
the point is | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:07:32 |
|
But that doesn't disprove... | by BrainBug | 2004-01-13 10:15:14 |
|
Yep, we've won the debate. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:18:01 |
|
Ok, name another then. | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 10:20:44 |
|
Well... | by BrainBug | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Amendment then *grin* | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:21:53 |
|
Define "continuous", then. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:25:00 |
|
Ongoing. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:27:55 |
|
Horrible definition, considering. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:32:26 |
|
where does | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:35:41 |
|
Good examples | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:36:41 |
|
peace | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:43:17 |
|
that is | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:44:26 |
|
Peace is an ideal | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:55:55 |
|
Are you sure about that? | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:05:09 |
|
Fairly sure. yes. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:09:15 |
|
and you fight more than you do not? | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:10:30 |
|
Myself, no. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:14:20 |
|
no but it does | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:21:43 |
|
I'm a selfish person | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:30:05 |
|
Neither does the military power | by BrainBug | 2004-01-13 10:43:52 |
|
Why would that be a requirement? | by tigermouse | 2004-01-13 10:44:28 |
|
Good point. I got side tracked :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:57:05 |
|
Now you're confusing "authority" | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:07:20 |
|
Perhaps | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:10:16 |
|
To which the only reasonable answer is... | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:11:04 |
|
Just because they had the courage to not | by dire_lobo | 2004-01-13 10:08:59 |
|
You are correct. "Satyagraha" in no way | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 11:37:23 |
|
both of you step away from the palantir (n/t) | by tegan | 2004-01-13 09:35:35 |
|
Well technically the EU. | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 09:38:30 |
|
And the EU has just started legislation to up it's | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:47:25 |
|
One of the few times Im glad about the UK mob view | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 09:57:24 |
|
Germany is downsizing its military ATM (n/t) | by Winsmith | 2004-01-13 10:48:14 |
|
That's internally. The EU is pushing for | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:58:03 |
|
Half a billion Catholics listen to and obey | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 09:47:35 |
|
And yet, we *still* have Catholics in the military | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:50:51 |
|
Yeah, because we all know the Revoloution had | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 09:54:53 |
|
Power was never specified. Being listened to | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 10:07:30 |
|
And yet, in the end, | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:11:29 |
|
Yeah, 70 year old Franklin humping over the snow. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:12:46 |
|
But it wasn't based in the *person* was it? :) | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:15:07 |
|
don't forget the french. (n/t) | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 10:18:19 |
|
Ha ha ha! | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:18:56 |
|
No, the US authority was not based in | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:22:48 |
|
Wasn't talking about the US authority. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:30:01 |
|
So it was force then, by your argument: | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:32:55 |
|
force never ends wars | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:38:04 |
|
Partially true. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:42:19 |
|
kinda like being almost pregnant? | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:47:03 |
|
Until someone pulls out a gun | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:53:24 |
|
well having the courage | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:00:13 |
|
I never said violence solves all problems | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:02:56 |
|
No of course not | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:09:28 |
|
sorry. I can't | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:12:51 |
|
OK, lets (reluctantly) pound home the nail, | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 10:23:21 |
|
Read the other threads. I never said the "biggest" | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:30:23 |
|
actually | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:52:38 |
|
Well, I still say it is. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:00:10 |
|
with respect to always losing | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:03:22 |
|
And it *was* achieved by force. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:06:56 |
|
but it wasnt achieved with violence | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:13:58 |
|
sorry | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:23:01 |
|
phew | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:31:42 |
|
You realize how much... | by Ravenlock | 2004-01-13 19:24:08 |
|
STOP CHANGING YOUR POSTULATES! | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 11:19:37 |
|
*shrug* | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:24:49 |
|
put they wouldn't be able to have the freedom to | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 10:13:22 |
|
s/put/but/ (n/t) | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 10:13:49 |
|
Your spouse perhaps? | by BrainBug | 2004-01-13 10:05:51 |
|
Agreed | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:08:35 |
|
All power fades in time. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:10:35 |
|
If it's based in a person, absolutely. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:13:38 |
|
No, you are wrong. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 10:20:00 |
|
All Empires fall, but military continues | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:25:00 |
|
Actually, force (as in armed force) is the visible | by LurkerMo | 2004-01-13 11:21:20 |
|
I'll agree with that to a point. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:31:38 |
|
Look at the world around you. | by LurkerMo | 2004-01-13 11:53:36 |
|
I agree | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 12:02:51 |
|
...and thus, my hopes are destroyed :p (n/t) | by Winsmith | 2004-01-13 09:29:23 |
|
so don't put your hopes in peace, but put them in | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 09:32:40 |
|
true. hopes in "intelligent people" are senseless. (n/t) | by Winsmith | 2004-01-13 09:33:51 |
|
See, we can agree on things :) (n/t) | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:36:50 |
|
Very Starship troopers of you. (n/t) | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 09:33:30 |
|
Wonderful book. Wonderful philosophy | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:38:01 |
|
Now you're sounding like Enders Game. | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 09:39:55 |
|
wouldn't that be nice? :) | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:43:03 |
|
Stop reminding me of books. ;-) | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 09:51:32 |
|
*laughs* | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:53:26 |
|
IIRC it was written pre-USSR collapse | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 10:04:25 |
|
to any sane person yes. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:06:41 |
|
Sounds like Nineteen eighty-four | by Irrelevant | 2004-01-13 09:45:53 |
|
I didnt read the book | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:14:51 |
|
The book is more of an examination | by dire_lobo | 2004-01-13 10:27:15 |
|
The movie and the book are very different | by AndyA | 2004-01-13 10:34:31 |
|
Peace thru superior firepower? | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 09:47:49 |
|
Why should it be the *only* incentive? | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:52:04 |
|
such as the biggest nuclear weapon. (n/t) | by woodchip | 2004-01-13 09:56:28 |
|
Or just the biggest number of smaller nukes. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 09:57:00 |
|
because if that is the source of your authority | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:26:53 |
|
People with the biggest guns don't usually | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:37:26 |
|
and yet | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 10:55:43 |
|
Morals are malleable. | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:04:09 |
|
??? Why do you feel that "force" and "violence" | by dire_lobo | 2004-01-13 10:23:31 |
|
Because violence = force | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 10:41:04 |
|
You don't get it, do you? | by NOLAWitch | 2004-01-13 10:52:56 |
|
And how is peer pressure *not* force? | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:04:52 |
|
I think that point has been | by gibuu | 2004-01-13 11:06:11 |
|
And, of course truth is force | by tigermouse | 2004-01-13 11:13:52 |
|
Precisely. Subbywan is so desperate to "win", that | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 11:16:06 |
|
That's "tautology". Sorry, but work interfered | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 11:24:06 |
|
Wasn't work, for me. | by Naruki | 2004-01-13 11:26:06 |
|
Thanks for sharing | by tigermouse | 2004-01-13 11:29:59 |
|
Thus indicating that Naruki fissioned? :+) | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 11:32:05 |
|
"Ya lump, ya" is what started me going that way, | by adiplomat | 2004-01-13 11:32:50 |
|
Uh, no. I posted "violent/force" | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:32:56 |
|
Huh??? | by dire_lobo | 2004-01-13 11:47:04 |
|
Sorry about that *grin* | by subbywan | 2004-01-13 11:54:32 |