The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Candidate Clark Weasels on Iraq-Al Qaeda link by DesertRat662006-11-19 12:55:59
  Surprised ? by scissors 2004-01-13 07:41:13
Of course he COULD have wanted to use Al Quaeda. But then, would AQ want to blow their covers? Since Afghanistan, the USA don't really seem to LOOK for AQ. This can have several reasons:
1- is it a cover-up/smokescreen-word invented by (***white house - pentagon - know others***) ... it wouldn't make sense to really investigate, because that could reveal the truth about lying. Not that lying presidents are often punished, unless it's about sex.
2- they found them (maybe back in afganistan) but shot them (accidentally, of course) and they don't want the world to find out ... now they release fake AQ messages, who cannot harm anyone but are good smokescreens
3- there really IS something like Al Qaeda, but they cannot find them ... and by telling they are searching, or showing evidence that the search is going on, they could be embarrassed: "that big powerful investigation doesn't find ANYthing, they're just big spenders of money needed elsewhere"

I don't like the first and second one, so for now i "hope" they're just keeping a low profile. Bu us politics doesn't keep low profiles on everything
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)