|
Heat seaking Fire Hoses needed | by plblark | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Aren't you satisfied that | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 06:54:44 |
|
We aren't Making them do that, | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 07:36:02 |
|
Give them a warm protected place | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 07:51:03 |
|
Why should any company | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 08:15:55 |
| Rationalize it all you want to |
by Slamlander |
2003-12-19 08:32:04 |
but those folks smoked long before you were there and smoking used top be permitted inside. Forcing them outside, in the Winter, without some sort of consideration, gives them a justified gripe. After all, they gave up something on their side, the least you can do is have a little sensitivity, or are you really the unfeeling and insensitive bastidge that you are accusing them of being.
Read your own post, that was the single most evil and unfeeling post that I have read this week. It doesn't look like the smokers are the ones being insensitive here.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I think personal bias is creeping in. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:50:52 |
|
You are exagerating muchly | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:57:08 |
|
so, since I don't want their pollution in my space | by plblark | 2003-12-19 09:12:55 |
|
Absolut, there's plenty of exageration | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 09:38:43 |
|
It has been building for much longer then that | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:02:07 |
|
As I said, plenty of exageration .. | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:11:39 |
|
I know what I said to be true as stated. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:20:44 |
|
Can we please try to separate the two issues? | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:17:09 |
|
They both relate directly to smoking | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:24:54 |
|
Wrong again. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 09:59:25 |
|
But it's not a proven effect | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:06:11 |
|
Show where my logic is flawed. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:33:01 |
|
What "used to be" is irrelevant. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 09:54:44 |
|
Aha! The worst form of convert | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:03:34 |
|
Ahem. I will have to disagree with you there. | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:11:05 |
|
What blew their credibility with me | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:32:23 |
|
I've never seen a study that claimed that. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:34:43 |
|
Seriously screwed up indeed. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:42:03 |
|
I might point out that, in Los Angeles | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:57:42 |
|
but the smoking can't help. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 11:02:34 |
|
It is sad, but not really relevant. (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 11:09:50 |
|
Yes it is because | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 13:46:31 |
|
Ah, statistics. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-22 06:45:07 |
|
You have failed to show any flaw in my logic. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:19:22 |