|
Heat seaking Fire Hoses needed | by plblark | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Aren't you satisfied that | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 06:54:44 |
|
We aren't Making them do that, | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 07:36:02 |
|
Give them a warm protected place | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 07:51:03 |
| Why should any company |
by BloodyViking |
2003-12-19 08:15:55 |
incur more expense to accomodate the frequent unscheduled work stoppages breaks that no other employees get or take, just to placate those who have, through no fault of the company, gotten themselves addicted to nicotine? A warm protected place would only encourage them to take more frequent and longer "smoke breaks".
The righteous indignation is on the Other side of the argument. Smoking stinks, it causes fire hazzards, even when ample ash trays are available smokers strew ash and butts all over the place and routinely flick lit butts out their car windows to the hazzard of dry brush and convertible drivers, and ignoring all the other claims of the hazzards of second-hand smoke, it is clearly and definitely harmful to those with allergies and to asthmatics.
Smokers made their choice, the consequences are their problem.
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Rationalize it all you want to | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:32:04 |
|
I think personal bias is creeping in. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:50:52 |
|
You are exagerating muchly | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:57:08 |
|
so, since I don't want their pollution in my space | by plblark | 2003-12-19 09:12:55 |
|
Absolut, there's plenty of exageration | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 09:38:43 |
|
It has been building for much longer then that | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:02:07 |
|
As I said, plenty of exageration .. | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:11:39 |
|
I know what I said to be true as stated. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:20:44 |
|
Can we please try to separate the two issues? | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:17:09 |
|
They both relate directly to smoking | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:24:54 |
|
Wrong again. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 09:59:25 |
|
But it's not a proven effect | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:06:11 |
|
Show where my logic is flawed. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:33:01 |
|
What "used to be" is irrelevant. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 09:54:44 |
|
Aha! The worst form of convert | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:03:34 |
|
Ahem. I will have to disagree with you there. | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:11:05 |
|
What blew their credibility with me | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:32:23 |
|
I've never seen a study that claimed that. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:34:43 |
|
Seriously screwed up indeed. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:42:03 |
|
I might point out that, in Los Angeles | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:57:42 |
|
but the smoking can't help. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 11:02:34 |
|
It is sad, but not really relevant. (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 11:09:50 |
|
Yes it is because | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 13:46:31 |
|
Ah, statistics. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-22 06:45:07 |
|
You have failed to show any flaw in my logic. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:19:22 |
